Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hurricane Emily (Live Thread, Part III)
NHC-NOAA ^ | 18 July 2005 | NHC-NOAA

Posted on 07/18/2005 5:59:11 AM PDT by NautiNurse

Hurricanes Emily and Dennis are the strongest July storms in recorded history for the Atlantic hurricane basin...

Hurricane Emily resources--the links are self-updating for handy reference:

NHC Hurricane Public Advisory Updates Currently published every three hours 5A, 8A, 11A, 2P, 5P, etc. ET.

NHC Hurricane Discussion Updates Published every 6 hours 5A, 11A, 5P, 11P ET

Storm Floater IR Loop Little boxes at top of image: lat/lon, and Trop Fcst Pts--click 'em.

Gulf of Mexico IR Loop

GOM Visible Loop (Only works during daylight hours)

Visible Storm Floater Sat Daylight Hours--Both loop and latest image

Western Gulf of Mexico Bouy Data

South Padre Island Weather

Brownsville TX radar loop 

Tampico Mexico Radar Very Slow Load

Hurricane Track Forecast

Hurricane Model Projections

Emily Forecast Track Archive Loop Great for reviewing the NHC 3 day and 5 day historic track positions



Some more resources:

Hurricane City

Global Satellite Imagery Amazing view of the world (Broadband)

Water Vapor SatelliteAnother colorful loop for broadband

Central Florida Hurricane Center offers a variety of info


The Saffir-Simpson Scale. Source: Hurricane Categories
Category Wind Speed Barometric
Pressure
Storm Surge Damage Potential
1
(weak)
75 - 95 mph
65 - 82 kts
33 - 42 m/s
> 28.94 in. Hg
> 980.0 mb
> 97.7 kPa
4.0 - 5.0 ft.
1.2 - 1.5 m
minimal damage to vegetation
2
(moderate)
96 - 110 mph
83 - 95 kts
43 - 49 m/s
28.50 - 28.93 in. Hg
965.1 - 979.7 mb
96.2 - 97.7 kPa
6.0 - 8.0 ft.
1.8 - 2.4 m
moderate damage to houses
3
(strong)
111 - 130 mph
96 - 113 kts
50 - 58 m/s
27.91 - 28.49 in. Hg
945.1 - 964.8 mb
96.2 - 97.7 kPa
9.0 - 12.0 ft.
2.7 - 3.7 m
extensive damage to small buildings
4
(very strong)
131 - 155 mph
114 - 135 kts
59 - 69 m/s
27.17 - 27.90 in. Hg
920.1 - 944.8 mb
91.7 - 94.2 kPa
13.0 - 18.0 ft.
3.9 - 5.5 m
extreme structural damage
5
(devastating)
> 155 mph
> 135 kts
> 70 m/s
< 27.17 in Hg
< 920.1 mb
< 91.7 kPa
> 18.0 ft
> 5.5 m
catastrophic building failures possible


TOPICS: Mexico; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: emily; hurricane; hurricaneemily; tropical; weather
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 541-556 next last
Hurricane Emily emerges from the Yucatan Peninsula into the very warm Western Gulf of Mexico.
1 posted on 07/18/2005 5:59:11 AM PDT by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aberaussie; Alas Babylon!; alnick; Amelia; asp1; Bahbah; balrog666; blam; blueberry12; bonfire; ...

Hurricane Emily emerging into the Western Gulf of Mexico.

Heads up SE TX Freepers!

2 posted on 07/18/2005 6:00:59 AM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

A little ahead of schedule it seems.


3 posted on 07/18/2005 6:01:33 AM PDT by Miztiki (Pearland, TX (just southeast of Houston))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
No large graphics--use links
4 posted on 07/18/2005 6:04:35 AM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Here we go again..........................


5 posted on 07/18/2005 6:06:57 AM PDT by Gabz ((Chincoteague, VA) USSG Warning: Portable sewing machines are known to cause broken ankles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Cool. New thread. And I'm relatively early on this one... neat.


6 posted on 07/18/2005 6:07:04 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniDE; Clara Lou; RGVTx; Xenalyte; Tall_Texan; gdc314; Ditter; No Blue States; Proud_texan; ...

ping


7 posted on 07/18/2005 6:07:12 AM PDT by jpsb (I already know I am a terrible speller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
Hurricane Emily Thread II

Hurricane Emily Thread I

8 posted on 07/18/2005 6:09:11 AM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miztiki

?


9 posted on 07/18/2005 6:09:51 AM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

The innercore is well intact...its now offshore but over rather cooled upwelled water of 81-82 degrees...later today it will be moving over 84-85 water and a large area of 86-88+ degree water before it hits land...the light wind shear has diminished....I'm afraid this will explode in strength as the day goes on....


10 posted on 07/18/2005 6:10:57 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Thank you for managing these hurricane threads. (Funny, I typed "threats". Hopefully Emily won't be to the U.S.)


11 posted on 07/18/2005 6:11:02 AM PDT by realpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

the eyewall of Hurricane Emily passed over Cozumel a few hours ago.
The Air Force Reserve hurricane hunter aircraft overflew the island
during the eyewall passage...at 05z...and reported peak flight
level winds of 124 kt. At 0322z...they reported 141 kt. Landfall
occurred near 0630z just north of Tulum. The reconnaissance data
suggest that Emily likely made landfall as a category four
hurricane with maximum winds near 115 kt. No observations have yet
been received from the landfall area.
Emily will be spending roughly 9 hours over the Yucatan...but is
likely to maintain hurricane strength during this passage. A weak
upper-level low over the Bay of Campeche may be contributing some
southwesterly shear over Emily...but global models suggest that
this upper low will move west-southwestward and weaken within 12-24
hours. This would result in an upper-tropospheric environment
conducive to strengthening. Therefore...re-intensification is
likely once the center moves back over the waters of the southern
Gulf of Mexico. Just how much Emily restrengthens is partly
dependent on the extent that the inner core is disrupted after
passing over northern Yucatan.

The initial motion...295/15...is about the same as before...and the
official track forecast is also basically unchanged. NOAA and Air
Force Reserve aircraft conducted synoptic surveillance missions in
the Gulf and northwestern Caribbean last night. Dropsonde data from
these missions show a mid-level ridge solidly in place across the
northern Gulf. Global models indicate that this ridge could weaken
a little over the next 12-18 hours with the passage of a
mid-latitude short wave to the north. The upper low in the Bay of
Campeche could also result in a slight rightward deflection of the
track. However...both of these influences should diminish in
another 24 hours or so and the track should then Bend back toward
the left. The GFS...which has performed well with this storm...is
on the southern side of the guidance envelope...while the NOGAPS is
on the northern egde. The official forecast is in good agreement
with the FSU superensemble...which in fact has outperformed both
the NOGAPS and GFS with this cyclone. None of the Standard guidance
shows a landfall in south Texas at this time. Nevertheless...given
that the average 48 hour track error is about 140 nmi...such a
landfall is entirely possible.
1-minute data from NOAA buoy 42056 were helpful in adjusting the 34
kt wind radii in the southeast quadrant.

Forecaster Franklin


forecast positions and Max winds

initial 18/0900z 20.6n 88.0w 95 kt
12hr VT 18/1800z 21.6n 90.1w 75 kt
24hr VT 19/0600z 22.9n 92.8w 85 kt
36hr VT 19/1800z 23.8n 95.2w 95 kt
48hr VT 20/0600z 24.4n 97.7w 100 kt...inland
72hr VT 21/0600z 25.0n 103.0w 25 kt...dissipating
96hr VT 22/0600z...dissipated


12 posted on 07/18/2005 6:11:39 AM PDT by jpsb (I already know I am a terrible speller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Miss Emily was in a big hurry to get back over warm water.


13 posted on 07/18/2005 6:13:52 AM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse; Gabz

Thank-You for being such a wonderful Thread keeper:)

Sorry Gabz I could not resist.....:)


14 posted on 07/18/2005 6:14:28 AM PDT by fivekid ( STOP THE WORLD!!!!! I wanna get off.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

"?"

Emily is a bit ahead of schedule, my reply to her entering the Gulf.


15 posted on 07/18/2005 6:15:20 AM PDT by Miztiki (Pearland, TX (just southeast of Houston))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Just how much Emily restrengthens is partly dependent on the extent that the inner core is disrupted after passing over northern Yucatan.

any indications of how much disruption the land mass caused?

16 posted on 07/18/2005 6:16:39 AM PDT by RobFromGa (Send Bolton to the UN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

if landfall was at 6:30Z looks it was off the coast at 12:40z or so...so only 6-7 hrs over land..it looks like it came out a bit north..and therefore the more skinny part of land


17 posted on 07/18/2005 6:17:09 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
I'll see if I can land any live streams later today.

Jim Williams at Hurricane City went live last night, and is streaming the shortwave Hurricane Watch Net at HurricaneCity.com now.

18 posted on 07/18/2005 6:17:36 AM PDT by mhking (The world needs a wake up call gentlemen...we're gonna phone it in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking

Thank you--would be greatly appreciated.


19 posted on 07/18/2005 6:18:32 AM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Batten down the hatches.


20 posted on 07/18/2005 6:18:56 AM PDT by SE Mom (God Bless those who serve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 541-556 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson