Skip to comments.
Al-Qaida's U.S. Nuclear Targets
WorldNetDaily ^
| 7/18/05
| FROM JOSEPH FARAH'S G2 BULLETIN
Posted on 07/18/2005 3:39:51 AM PDT by Man50D
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-126 next last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator
To: bill1952; Neoliberalnot; Pat The Postman
You two need to see #58, and take a chill pill.
62
posted on
07/18/2005 5:12:00 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(This space intentionally blank) (NRA)
To: Pat The Postman
If that litany of kool aid garbage is what you call not "left", then you are nuts. Virtually nothing that you postulate is true - It sounds like you plagiarized it from the NYT.
I don't see even a paper thin difference between you and Durbin, Boxer or Kennedy.
I stand by my assessment.
63
posted on
07/18/2005 5:13:10 AM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
Comment #64 Removed by Moderator
To: bill1952; Neoliberalnot
Actually, after a closer look at 58, I may be coming around to your view of things.
Still not a garden variety troll, though.
65
posted on
07/18/2005 5:16:51 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(This space intentionally blank) (NRA)
To: FreedomPoster
I am sorry, but fraternity pranks do not constitute atrocities as the Old Media claim. Only an idiot would equate these stunts with opposition actions.
Item 2: I see no evidence that the engagement in Iraq was a mistake. The surrounding muslim states are terrified that a representative republic might succeed, hence the reason many of the terrorists there are entering from outside the borders. If Iraq succeeds, their despotic rulers fail and they know this. President Bush knows that the terrorists must be fought on foreign soil, or we will fight them here and they won't be engaging our trained warriors, they will confront only unarmed civilians. Only a fool would wish otherwise.
66
posted on
07/18/2005 5:19:15 AM PDT
by
Neoliberalnot
(Conservatism: doing what is right instead of what is easy)
To: Man50D
The point about small-country or terrorist nuclear weapons - of either the 'dirty' or 'big bang' types - is that their use would wonderfully concentrate the US's attention on the user. This has not, in the past, proven to be a good idea.
67
posted on
07/18/2005 5:20:56 AM PDT
by
Grut
To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
"All are blue cities in blue states, except...? Miami and Vegas?"Miami and Vegas have high Jewish demographics.
68
posted on
07/18/2005 5:21:04 AM PDT
by
albee
(The best thing you can do for the poor is...not be one of them!)
To: FreedomPoster
I agree, not a garden varity, but an EU type troll, as he pointed out.
He would be a BIG hit over at the DU, where his views are pretty much lockstep with them.
69
posted on
07/18/2005 5:22:57 AM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Pat The Postman
You are unaware of the "domino theory", the notion that bring freedom to a few countries in the middle east, the rest of the countries will be profoundly changed for the better. Much as Germany and Japan after WWII changed their surrounding countries for the better.
Freedom is a universal right.
The level of violence will not remain at the same level. IMO it will either get much worse or disappear off the face of the middle east.
70
posted on
07/18/2005 5:23:33 AM PDT
by
tkathy
(Tyranny breeds terrorism. Freedom breeds peace.)
To: ConsentofGoverned
The Tech side that you mention is one reason why I'm so skeptical of this story.
71
posted on
07/18/2005 5:28:08 AM PDT
by
Ajnin
(I)
To: Pat The Postman
In fact, Saddam was on his last legs. Welcome to FR Pat. Stick around and we'll bring you around.
There were rumors he had cancer before the war. It doesn't appear now that he did, or at least I've seen no reports of it.
He did have two sons he'd groomed for succession, who by all accounts were crueler than even he was. They're dead now, and that's a good thing.
72
posted on
07/18/2005 5:28:54 AM PDT
by
tsomer
To: Pat The Postman
I appreciate your honesty even though I couldn't disagree more. Given your statement
Iraq wasn't a breeding ground for terrorists I suggest you read the following article:
Exclusive: Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties
The breeding ground you refer to is located in Syria and Iran. Iraq is the result. It may very well take several years to implement Democracy as it did with Germany and Japan after World War II but none of us knows exactly how long it will take. The death toll in Iraq will be far less than it will be in the U.S. if we pull our troops out of Iraq. The only corner we could paint ourselves into is by not meeting terrorism head on in Iraq or any country. Iraq was a failed state under the twenty five year rule of a tyrannical dictator. There is no failing in given citizens a voice in their own destiny. Hearts and minds are in the process of being changed but it will take a long time. Shock and awe took only three weeks to defeat Saddam Hussein. If that isn't success I don't know what is success.
73
posted on
07/18/2005 5:30:04 AM PDT
by
Man50D
Comment #74 Removed by Moderator
To: Pat The Postman
So you like what we did for Europe, but don't want to give Middle Easterners the same opportunity?
Got it.
75
posted on
07/18/2005 5:35:10 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(This space intentionally blank) (NRA)
To: Pat The Postman
This attitude takes courage and can bring you into trouble more easily than when you sit comfortably in some camp left or right.
I respectfully disagree. It doesn't take courage to voice your opinion in a democracy that not only permits people to speak their minds but encourages debate. It would be courageous if you expressed a dissenting point of view in Iran.
76
posted on
07/18/2005 5:35:13 AM PDT
by
Man50D
To: Man50D
Yet another good reason for the liberals to moveo to Canada before it's too late.
To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
Miami is Blue, but the state is Red.
I thought that Osama promised he'd not attack any state that voted for Kerry.
I guess that shows what his promises are worth.
To: Pat The Postman
That is precisely the reason we must elect a strong, warrior leader for a president. Nothing else matters.
Especially not a wussy appeaser.
79
posted on
07/18/2005 5:42:17 AM PDT
by
tkathy
(Tyranny breeds terrorism. Freedom breeds peace.)
To: Man50D
Once again Farah comes out almost hoping for a nuclear attack on the Untied States. Last time it was the Iranian EMP strike he was predicting now it is Al Qaeda nukes.
Farah is nothing but an fear mongering, attention seeking whore, who writes for a kook website. Anyone who takes him seriously :cough, cough: Tom Tancredo :cough, cough: needs to have their heads examined.
80
posted on
07/18/2005 5:43:18 AM PDT
by
COEXERJ145
(Tom Tancredo- The Republican Party's Very Own Howard Dean.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-126 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson