No, the Steele thing is not small potatoes, it is just one example of targeting money. If the Dems lost 1 or 2 more senate seats, expecially to staunch conservatives in 2006, Bush will have an even easier chance for another one or even 2 supremes. The Freshmen class of Repubs senators are not yet jaded and seem to be still prinicpled in their efforts to get conservative ideas pushed through. Add a couple more"new bloods" to that mix and conservative have a better chance internally against the likes of the stale-blooded McCains and Dewines of the world.
"There is nothing more important to the Libs than the Supreme Court. The day after Bush was reelected, the Democrats started planning for his impeachment."
Never mind that this bogus scandal goes back to July 2003.
Nobody in their right mind doesn't realize this is all about hurting Bush, one way or the other.
What makes you think that is news?
"Losing Rove would not prevent Bush from reshaping the Supreme Court. Nothing would short of impeachment. Therefore, you know the goal here. There is nothing more important to the Libs than the Supreme Court. The day after Bush was reelected, the Democrats started planning for his impeachment."
I can't argue with you on this, PD. The hue and cry has always been that W was appointed not elected in 2000 and in Ohio the 2004 win was tainted. The Liberals losing 'control' of SCOTUS could result in enormous financial loss to the abortion mills, a major financier of the Left---it would help state prosecution of death penalties, which would hurt the prison-construction/prison guard union vote pork barrels---roll back the international law/Marxist/UN rubbish---and much more.