e-m the author and he will put you on his e-m list.
Exactly right!
OH...MY...GOD!
This one's a keeper; thanks for the re-post.
Liberals have to be PC and not hurt anyones feelings. They won't shoot anyone but will try to talk them to death.
ping to a good read.
see also
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1444737/posts
'This could be the stupidest non-scandal ever'
hurray for mr inbred,mr deliverance JIMMAH
The MAVERICK blaster features a six-dart rotating barrel with easy flip loading so you dont have to waste any time while blasting enemy targets! Rapid launching action increases your battle speed and accuracy! Other features include pullback mechanism and auto-advancing barrel. * Blaster comes with six darts and instructions. The MAVERICK is a part of the N-STRIKE team, so you can snap it onto the UNITY POWER SYSTEM (sold separately) and ratchet the NERF action up another notch! CAUTION: Do not aim at eyes or face. To avoid injury, use only darts designed for this product. Do not modify darts or dart blaster.
Thanks, I've been a fan of Bowers for a while.
Liberals are livid, mainly because, secretly, they know Rove has them nailed. Their party in the past 60 years has a rich history of appeasement, defeatism, naivete, fear and weakness.
-----
When it comes to the issue of terror and the libs, Rove gets the Nobel prize, for perfect classification of the miserable libs.
'Again, my caveat: Many Democrats are not weak Americans. But nearly all weak Americans are Democrats. '
Like Jay Severin's caveat:
"Not all Mooslims are Terrorists, but so far, All Terrorists are Mooslims..."
"For 70 years, they refused to take communism seriously."
I will have to disagree. They have taken communism very seriously. That is why they are still upset with Nixon and Reagan for outing their heros in the media and government.
New tagline.
Bump.
I guess the Spitball wasn't invented yet.
BUMP!!!
Nah, never happen, they'd have to give up their metrosexual agenda.
The Left is so desperate it's laughable.
Could minor Ambassador Joe Wilson himself have been the source in blowing his own Wife's cover?
It is distinctly possible, (though it may be unlikely that Joe Wilson himself directly was NY Times Judith Miller's source), since Joe Wilson himself evidently routinely bragged openly to strangers about her CIA employment, prior to such "cover" being "blown" in the press.
Here's an example of Joe's apparently routine and open bragging about Valerie being a "CIA agent," which became known directly to me over a year ago:
He certainly bragged about it per a famous and highly reliable source's (named below) account of his own face-to-face encounter with Amb. Joe Wilson prior to Valerie Plame's "outing" as a CIA agent/employee.
Based upon a personal conversation (we were in a small group eating; it was NOT an "off the record") I had with eminent historian Victor Davis Hanson (we were at a luncheon table together during a trip to Europe), it appeared entirely possible that Joe Wilson himself was the (or one source, if not the original one) possible source in revealing his own wife's status as a CIA agent or employee.
Victor Davis Hanson (Wilson presumably knew Victor Davis Hanson wrote regularly for NRO (National Review Online), had done OpEds for the Wall street Journal, and other publications, and had his own Website with a widespread following) said he (VDH) & Joe Wilson were both in the same "Green Room" before a televised debate-discussion on Iraq, etc. and Joe first warned the TV make-up person not to get powder on his $14,000 Rolex watch, then he bragged to Victor about several things (possessions and trips to Aspen, etc.), like his expensive car (I think it was a Mercedes), and then bragged about his beautiful wife who, Joe Wilson said (braggingly) was a CIA operative.
I asked Victor Davis Hanson Why he didn't write up this account.(?) He replied that Joe Wilson would probably simply deny it, since only he (VDH) & Joe Wilson were in the Green Room together before the broadcast.
However, it is now easy to surmise that Joe Wilson is a crass, materialistic, self-promoting, vain, egotistical, bragaddocio-opportunist, so this account is perfectly consistent with Valerie Plame's TWO photo shoots in Vanity Fair. (Or was it Vogue? No, probably too crass for Vogue, n'est pas?)