To: mainepatsfan
I'm listening to fat tim talking to Matt Cooper it's ponderous, what BS, they are saying nothing.
208 posted on
07/17/2005 7:09:53 AM PDT by
rodguy911
(Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU and all Mosques in the US,UK.)
To: rodguy911
Specter says the SC has taken on too much power and judicial restraint is very important. Says Bush stands above the fray and is not beholden to any group. Specter wants someone on the court who is a swing vote. He made contradictory points and Brit called him on it.
211 posted on
07/17/2005 7:12:00 AM PDT by
Bahbah
(Something wicked this way comes)
To: rodguy911
Flip over to the Sports Reporters on ESPN. You'll get a much more of a debate.
To: rodguy911
I linked to Newsweek's story about Rove and then went to the next story on the prosecutor by Michael Koran. It was very interesting. It seems that official Washington had a negative opinion about Fitzgerald when he was going after reporters (black hat). However, now that he might be going after a Bush administration official official Washington is rethinking their opinion of Fitzgerald (white hat). The most disconcerting thing is that the story ended with a leak from the leak prosecutor's office on how he stiffed Rove's lawyer.
My opinion is that the left media is giving Fitzgerald a choice, be a hero or be destroyed.
To: rodguy911
The big smokescreen that Cooper is laying down is the connection between the waivers he got to testify and his "source". I believe that the reason his lawyer sought confirmation from Rove that he had a waiver on the day of his testimony is to distract us from the "other" waiver he had from his true source. He is leaving us habnging out there thinking the Rove waiver and the source waiver are one andf the same when they are not.
When interviewed by Timmy he wouldn't confirm whom else he had waivers from and whether one of them was his source and this was someone other than Rove.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson