Law Protects Women But Victimizes Many Men

Los Angeles Daily Journal; San Francisco Daily Journal | July 13, 2005 | Gordon Finley

[JudgemAll]

Yep yep yep. Even criminal women known by authorities to exploit children by vitualy prostituting children to their boyfriends and what not get custody. It's part of the "bortion for women's welfare" logic.

The Nazies in the sytem pretend they do not know what goes on.

In a country of empowerment of women, which bases survival on power, is a country out to kill each other, about who can put the other's nose in the sewer first.

It's evil of the greatest under guise of feminism.

[Maceman]

At stake are votes in 2006.

This line strikes me as rather an odd ending for this article.

[tessalu]

Yes, men do need equal protection from some women. Give it to them, for it is not fair.

[Fido969]

VAWA has become the employment act for womens' study majors. (What else could you do with that degree?) This is a SOCIAL initiative that was formed in the Clinton years. While politically VERY active, there has been only a negligible decrease in domestic violence over the 20 years and billions of dollars spent on these programs. I hate to break the news to you - but VAWA ain't about domestic violence.

Nor would groups supported by VAWA want a decrease in domestic violence. They would rather keep doing what they are doing - getting access to police DAs and politicians in order to spew their "men are BAD BAD BAD" diatribe. I mean, have you met any of these women? What a piece of work they are.

[PeterPrinciple]

What ever happened to all are equal?

[PeterPrinciple]

What ever happened to all are equal?

[ladyjane]

Have I met some of these women? No. But I've seen the names of the dead ones in the newspapers.

[demlosers]

What ever happened to all are equal?

Its been hijacked by the feminist man hating crowd.

[brookwood1]

This misses the point, which is that it is unjust to punish one man for the crime of another. It's a sexist stereotype that men are aggressors in domestic situations. It may be in general true, but its still a stereotype - like "women are weak" or "women tend to leave the workforce in mid-career". It is unjust to base laws on sexist stereotypes.

[infidel29]

There is, however, a critical hidden agenda. That agenda - buried under the smokescreen of Violence Against Women Act rhetoric - is: (a)...(b)...c)...

...and thus the left's war on the family continues. Destroy all that is good, warp the American dream, leave the populace wanting and reliant on the bureaucracy. The DUtopia of the left.

[Fido969]

Have I met some of these women? No. But I've seen the names of the dead ones in the newspapers.

6 billion + spent on VAWA didn't seem to help those women much.

[Fido969]

The problem is that some folks automatically think that VAWA has something to do with preventing domestic violence. It never has and never will.

It's not about domestic violence - it's about creating an industry to support radical fems.

[JudgemAll]

Women killed in the process? You betcha.

But worse, the system is the employer, it employs power struggle violence and it blames the employees. Ah!

Also many elderly women who bust their knees doing manual labor pay for these programs and welfare frauds. I hear them at work complaining. This is govenment feminist domestic abuse on women we don't hear about.

Another side effect is out of wedlock relationships and even terrorism. Destroy the patriotic base, the care for future generations, promote access through power and all defenses breakdown.

I mean, on 911 a bunch of liberal feminist lawyers fell off the building too.... do they realize it?

[ken21]

university feminists have sought for decades to locate the power of bringing up children to women, the state, and eventually the u.n.

the men supply the sperm and the money. (some day the sperm may not be necessary, but the money will.)

even capitalism has located the power to women. women spend 2/3 -3/4 of the consumer dollar. consequently, most everything is designed for women.

any male that thinks he's "equal" hasn't been recently on a university campus or divorced.

[JudgemAll]

I mean, have you met any of these women? What a piece of work they are.

I have many. You can't argue with them. It's a mix of quarter Dr.Jekyl at school and in the courtroom, Mr.Hyde back stabbing child exploiting vicious men torturing ghouls when it comes to covering up evidence in favor of women, quarter part paranoid power hungry, quarter part devil worshiper against relationship with children, quarter part bipolar fantasy gay welfare addicted matchmaker pimp advocate between women,their children and town thugs or even radical chic terrorist sympathizers.

[metalurgist]

What ever happened to all are equal?

All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.*
Napoleon the pig from George Orwell's Animal Farm

[Fido969]

Hmmm... You HAVE met these women.

[SamAdams76]

I have two sons and my advice to them is to be very, very careful with women and marriage. Stay away from women that are into "feminism". For not only will they see you as their oppressor, but they will probably have homosexual leanings. A good amount of feminists are either bisexual or out and out lesbians.

As well, stay away from women who have no intention of, or have no desire to, work and contribute to the family income. For they will feel entitled to share in your wealth and will assume no fiscal responsibility of their own while expecting you, the man, to always provide. Now that's not to say that the woman shouldn't take a break from her career and stay home when the kids are little. But if the woman is expecting a lifetime of sitting on the couch watching soap operas and eating bon-bons while you slave away at the daily grind, stay far, far away.