Please, no offense to anybody, but this is ... well, let's just say it's unreasonable. I realize the author is trying to cheer up the base, rally the Republican troops, but his assertions, as I said, are not reasonable.
The world isn't "reasonable" any more.
Is it "reasonable" to believe that a teacher, that taught children with disabilities, would just strap a bomb on his back, and blow up a train one day in London? I don't think so, but it happened...
I don't think Horowitz' theory is any less reasonable than the one floated by the MSM, the dems and Joe Wilson.
And, remember Rathergate? Wouldn't you have thought it to be unreasonable that a major news network's anchor would report a story about the POTUS using falsified and forged documents? Sounds unreasonable to me, but it happened...
I understand where you are coming from, but David Horowitz is pretty "in the know" about the goings on in Washington, and among the "elite", as I am sure the Wilson's consider themselves...so, let's just say, until a better explanation comes along...
I won't discount his!
They are the truth which you and members of the left are about to find out. You should have read the Intelligence Committee report before making such a statement. Thanks for telling us your agenda on here. Add another one to the list!
BTW, Horowitz never writes something to make the base happy. Since when were we down about this -- liberals and RATs are about to get egg all over their face because Rove never was a target as the RATs and their compadres in the media are finding out.
What David has laid out, is circumspect, to say the least, and nonimfamatroy.The base doesn't NEED to be "rallied", since none of us are downtrodden by the Dems'/MSM's attempt to take Rove down and smear the president with this hoax, is making all of us scream with laughter.
I suggest that you go back to DU; you've failed in your mission here.
Do you know who David Horowitz is? His background and transformation from radical leftist from the Viet Nam days, makes his comments not only perfectly reasonable but probably more insightful than those who simply chalk this up to old fashioned American politics.
His assertions are exactly correct. This has been becoming more obvious as this has unfolded. It was clear at the time that Wilson's "mission" was a treasonous one.