Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CFR's Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada
eagleforum.org ^ | July 13, 2005 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 07/16/2005 5:16:18 PM PDT by servingchrist

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has just let the cat out of the bag about what's really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries. A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

"Community" means integrating the United States with the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. "Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

"Community" is sometimes called "space" but the CFR goal is clear: "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely." The CFR's "integrated" strategy calls for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people."

The CFR document lays "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." The "common security perimeter" will require us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations" with Mexico and Canada, "harmonize entry screening," and "fully share data about the exit and entry of foreign nationals."

This CFR document, called "Building a North American Community," asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.

It was at this same meeting, grandly called the North American summit, that President Bush pinned the epithet "vigilantes" on the volunteers guarding our border in Arizona.

A follow-up meeting was held in Ottawa on June 27, where the U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, told a news conference that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders." The White House issued a statement that the Ottawa report "represents an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership."

The CFR document calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages.

Just to make sure that bringing cheap labor from Mexico is an essential part of the plan, the CFR document calls for "a seamless North American market" and for "the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico."

The document's frequent references to "security" are just a cover for the real objectives. The document's "security cooperation" includes the registration of ballistics and explosives, while Canada specifically refused to cooperate with our Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).

To no one's surprise, the CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico.

The experience of the European Union and the World Trade Organization makes it clear that a common market requires a court system, so the CFR document calls for "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution." Get ready for decisions from non-American judges who make up their rules ad hoc and probably hate the United States anyway.

The CFR document calls for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR document calls for adopting a "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met U.S. standards.

The CFR document demands that we implement "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." That's code language for putting illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, which is bound to bankrupt the system.

Here's another handout included in the plan. U.S. taxpayers are supposed to create a major fund to finance 60,000 Mexican students to study in U.S. colleges.

To ensure that the U.S. government carries out this plan so that it is "achievable" within five years, the CFR calls for supervision by a North American Advisory Council of "eminent persons from outside government . . . along the lines of the Bilderberg" conferences.

The best known Americans who participated in the CFR Task Force that wrote this document are former Massachusetts Governor William Weld and Bill Clinton's immigration chief Doris Meissner. Another participant, American University Professor Robert Pastor, presented the CFR plan at a friendly hearing of Senator Richard Lugar's Foreign Relations Committee on June 9.

Ask your Senators and Representatives which side they are on: the CFR's integrated North American Community or U.S. sovereignty guarded by our own borders.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: border; bordersecurity; bush; bushamnesty; canada; canuckistan; cfr; freetraitors; illegalaliens; invasionusa; mexico; namericancommunity; paulmartin; trade; vicentefox
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last
Has anyone else read this? This is unreal. I was able to find this information on the CFR web site as well.
1 posted on 07/16/2005 5:16:20 PM PDT by servingchrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servingchrist

Bush is surrounded with CFR minions. That does not bode well for America.


2 posted on 07/16/2005 5:21:39 PM PDT by eskimo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eskimo; servingchrist

Better learn to speak Spanish.


3 posted on 07/16/2005 5:22:50 PM PDT by John Filson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Filson

I know enough Spanish, but I only speak English. America is the melting pot, meaning people who come here are supposed to assimilate into American culture not the other way around. I don’t know how the CFR plans on making this happen, perhaps with CAFTA and the FTAA???


4 posted on 07/16/2005 5:26:04 PM PDT by servingchrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Filson
Better learn to speak Spanish.

Yep, 'cause the Mexis sure aren't going to be required to learn English.

5 posted on 07/16/2005 5:27:41 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: servingchrist

There has to be a mistake. I would no more trust a Canadian with my security than I would a Mexican with my wallet. The GOP better tread carefully here. Voter loyalty is at risk over this.


6 posted on 07/16/2005 5:29:07 PM PDT by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eskimo

Pipe down, vigilante!!!! You'll do what the elites tell you to , and LOVE IT!

/s


7 posted on 07/16/2005 5:29:11 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (Support George Allen in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eskimo

Bush is surrounded with CFR minions. That does not bode well for America.
-------
First, the Bush family has been working on this for a long time for this very reason. Second, this is WHY THE BUSH ADMINSTRATION HAS BEEN PUTTING HEAVY POLITICAL PRESSURE (QUIETLY) ON THE CONGRESS TO PASS THE CAFTA DEAL.

Any questions now about WHY Bush says or does nothing about the Mexican invasion of America???


8 posted on 07/16/2005 5:29:53 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servingchrist

No doubt CAFTA and FTAA are on CFR's globalist roadmap for our future.


9 posted on 07/16/2005 5:30:12 PM PDT by John Filson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

No mistake. GWB is leading us places his father and BJ would never imagine. I hope he rots in eternal emptiness if he sells us out like what is being planned.


10 posted on 07/16/2005 5:32:21 PM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John Filson

I heard about this about a month ago from a local radio talk show host...

He was saying during his show that the "security" part is supposedly because of the fear of China...and that it would take all three countries coming together to form one continuouse border around North America to keep China from taking over...

I was sickened then, when I thought it was some leftist group that Clinton/Gore would be involved in, but if it is TRUE that President Bush signed off on this and so did Chertoff, then we are in deep doo-doo..

I just heard today on Fox News that Chertoff said that he "fears" the Northern border of American more than the southern re: terrorists because Canada has been way too accomodating to the Islamofascist groups...

How can he feel THAT way, but still want an open border?


11 posted on 07/16/2005 5:32:27 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: servingchrist

Am not surprised. This gang has been ruling the world since the Berlin Wall came down. Globalization, NAFTA (a few potholes, but once we export every job in the US to the third world, big business will have low overhead and lots of new customers with money to spend. The heck with the American worker/taxpayer. Outsourcing of jobs, and now CAFTA rammed down our throats. Open borders, mass migration north...this in the midst of worldwide terrorism. The idea is that they'll eventually go home, but we know this won't happen. Why would anyone in his right mind go back to the place they just left because they couldn't stand it any longer?

And the piece de resistance!!! They're not illegal aliens. The new term is 'trusted travelers'. How stupid do they think we are? No vote, no discussion, just get so many of them in here that they think they can say with a straight face, "Gee, twenty million. How'd that happen? Well, it's too late now. We can't possibly send them home. Here's the new plan..."


12 posted on 07/16/2005 5:32:29 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

GWB is turning out to be worse than Clinton in this regard.


13 posted on 07/16/2005 5:33:22 PM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Filson

No doubt CAFTA and FTAA are on CFR's globalist roadmap for our future.
-----
**** EXACTLY **** This is why many of us have been down on any politician supporting any so-called FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS --- these are alot more than JUST FTAs. They are license to kill for the ONE-AMERICA ELITISTS.


14 posted on 07/16/2005 5:33:30 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chris1

GWB is turning out to be worse than Clinton in this regard.
-------
By a long country mile!!! He is a major architect of this growing disaster.


15 posted on 07/16/2005 5:34:45 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I'll never forget Bush Daddy's words about the new Global Order. Yep, I voted for GW but it was either him or Kerry.


16 posted on 07/16/2005 5:38:07 PM PDT by Robert Lomax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hershey

Trusted traveler should be changed to Trusted trespasser. Who the F trusts a trespasser?

GWB has lost all my support because he basically sold our country out for the NWO. The positives do not outwiegh this negative.

He has become part of our country's problems. not the solution.


17 posted on 07/16/2005 5:38:54 PM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: servingchrist

To no one's surprise, the CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries.
------
Oh, this is just the tip of the iceburg. And of course, WHO IS GOING TO END UP PAYING FOR ALL OF THIS DIASTER??? And the talk about "security" -- what a sham. This thing has me shaking with anger!


18 posted on 07/16/2005 5:39:03 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servingchrist; Howlin

I think the following are setting up shop to handle things... Black helicopters and all.....

http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=14853965&BRD=1574&PAG=461&dept_id=532207&rfi=8


19 posted on 07/16/2005 5:39:26 PM PDT by deport (If you want something bad enough, there's someone who will sell it to you. Even the truth your way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey; All

CAFTA has NOT passed in the House yet...and there are hints that it might not, so it isn't too late to call your congresscritter and tell them, NO TO CAFTA...

It isn't much, but when telling them no to CAFTA, you might want to mention NO TO CFR as well. (of course you will probably have to explain to the person that answers the phone what CFR is!)


20 posted on 07/16/2005 5:42:05 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson