Go back and read what I wrote.
I did go on a tangent and plainly stated it.
I did say that in areas of ADVOCACY of any kind, the BS laws regarding hiring practices should not apply. That was one of the first things that I said.
I also said that our rights are ours regardless of what the government says. We just might have to fight to keep them. You are the one saying that the Constitution protects them. We defend our rights by exercising them.
I never said that he should be fired, much less demand it.
I didn't intend this to be a pissing contest. I also notice that with each response, you are getting closer to acknowledging that you agree with me. It's alright, go ahead. It'll make you feel better to just admit it. ;-)
Depends on what your real point is. You haven't been very clear.
If you think Santorum should fire the guy just because he was 'outed' against his will, I don't agree.
If your point is that so called 'discrimination' laws should not apply to private organizations, then we agree.
But if that was your whole point, why in the world did you start posting to me in the first place? I never said that they SHOULD apply.