Depends on what your real point is. You haven't been very clear.
If you think Santorum should fire the guy just because he was 'outed' against his will, I don't agree.
If your point is that so called 'discrimination' laws should not apply to private organizations, then we agree.
But if that was your whole point, why in the world did you start posting to me in the first place? I never said that they SHOULD apply.
Let's see if you can follow this time.
You posted a comment -- copied here:
"To: nmh
Mr. Family values man is a hypocrite.
So you think that Mr. Family values man should only hire married men with a wife at home taking care of the kids? Should he fire someone who has an affair, or gets divorced, or whose wife has an affair, or whose kids don't turn out right, or. . .? Are you saying you endorse employers having control over their employees private lives?
654 posted on 07/18/2005 10:58:05 AM EDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Which sparked my question to you along with some comments to explain why I said what I said. That post was:
Posted by Badray to MEGoody
On News/Activism ^ 07/18/2005 2:27:57 PM EDT · 678 of 716 ^
Should a Baptist church be forced to hire an atheist as the church secretary?
Besides all the foolish PC rules that override common sense these day, hiring for positions in the areas of religion and politics should be free of 'don't ask, don't tell' type rules. You [the advocacy group -- added now to clarify 'you'] are propogating a set of beliefs, why shouldn't you be able to be sure that you hire someone who is aligned with you and reject those who aren't?
National security just might fall within that realm too. I don't think that we should be hiring Muslims and commies for postitions in the Defense Dep't or munitions factories.