Not at all. The underlying assumption here is that any gay person MUST be in full support of the Gay Agenda. Not all gays are militant, not all gays want to force their lifestyle choice down everyone else's throat or in everyone else's face. The very fact that Santorum has a staffer who is gay, but supports Santorum's political stance is evidence of that.
This is the stance of the MSM, because they cannot allow the appearance of anything but absolute solidarity of all gays against traditional family values. The fact that not all gays support the so-called gay agenda is the "dirty little secret" that the MSM works hard to hide. You are taking the MSM's talking points as your own.
And no, I am not in favor of the gay agenda. I am not gay, and I disagree on theological and biblical grounds with the whole idea that being gay is inevitible, genetic, or a legitimate "alternative" lifestyle. The bible calls it sin, and so do I.
" The very fact that Santorum has a staffer who is gay, but supports Santorum's political stance is evidence of that. "
Doesn't that raise an eyebrow with you?
A homosexual AGAINST what he is?
And this is a "top" staffer?
LOL!