Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CFR's Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada [Bye Bye USA]
Eagle Forum ^ | July 13, 2005 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 07/15/2005 8:24:24 PM PDT by twas

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has just let the cat out of the bag about what's really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries. A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

"Community" means integrating the United States with the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. "Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

"Community" is sometimes called "space" but the CFR goal is clear: "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely." The CFR's "integrated" strategy calls for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people."

The CFR document lays "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." The "common security perimeter" will require us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations" with Mexico and Canada, "harmonize entry screening," and "fully share data about the exit and entry of foreign nationals."

This CFR document, called "Building a North American Community," asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.

It was at this same meeting, grandly called the North American summit, that President Bush pinned the epithet "vigilantes" on the volunteers guarding our border in Arizona.

A follow-up meeting was held in Ottawa on June 27, where the U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, told a news conference that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders." The White House issued a statement that the Ottawa report "represents an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership."

The CFR document calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages.

Just to make sure that bringing cheap labor from Mexico is an essential part of the plan, the CFR document calls for "a seamless North American market" and for "the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico."

The document's frequent references to "security" are just a cover for the real objectives. The document's "security cooperation" includes the registration of ballistics and explosives, while Canada specifically refused to cooperate with our Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).

To no one's surprise, the CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico.

The experience of the European Union and the World Trade Organization makes it clear that a common market requires a court system, so the CFR document calls for "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution." Get ready for decisions from non-American judges who make up their rules ad hoc and probably hate the United States anyway.

The CFR document calls for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR document calls for adopting a "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met U.S. standards.

The CFR document demands that we implement "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." That's code language for putting illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, which is bound to bankrupt the system.

Here's another handout included in the plan. U.S. taxpayers are supposed to create a major fund to finance 60,000 Mexican students to study in U.S. colleges.

To ensure that the U.S. government carries out this plan so that it is "achievable" within five years, the CFR calls for supervision by a North American Advisory Council of "eminent persons from outside government . . . along the lines of the Bilderberg" conferences.

The best known Americans who participated in the CFR Task Force that wrote this document are former Massachusetts Governor William Weld and Bill Clinton's immigration chief Doris Meissner. Another participant, American University Professor Robert Pastor, presented the CFR plan at a friendly hearing of Senator Richard Lugar's Foreign Relations Committee on June 9.

Ask your Senators and Representatives which side they are on: the CFR's integrated North American Community or U.S. sovereignty guarded by our own borders.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2006; agenda21; aliens; borders; borderxxi; cafta; cfr; communism; enviromentalists; freetraitors; ftaa; globalists; illegalimmigration; immigrantlist; immigration; oneworldtinfoil; sovereigntygone; tinfoil; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: TMSuchman

...The problem was how were they going to get the American people to go along with this...

It will be for the chilluns or for security or some such drama.

The docs will be sitting there on the shelf, when the right moment presents itself and it will all be voted and signed without the nonmembers having a clue..


61 posted on 07/16/2005 4:46:55 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
They had no loyalty to the Roman state but rather to their ethnic group or place of origin.

Explains the chants of "Viva Mexico!" at this year's Fourth of July celebration in Houston.

62 posted on 07/16/2005 4:51:08 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (New England...the Sodom and Gomorrah of the 21st Century, and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: twas

Anybody who has read "Magnus, Robot Fighter" saw this coming ages ago. (Magnus operated out of "North Am", if I recall correctly.)


63 posted on 07/16/2005 4:53:40 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (New England...the Sodom and Gomorrah of the 21st Century, and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com; All

Who says that the docs have not already been drawn up. I have a VERY bad feeling about this! There are evil forces at work here in our country & the rest of the world.

Just remember that the second comming is is almost here, but we have to deal with 7 years of he!! first.


64 posted on 07/16/2005 5:16:46 PM PDT by TMSuchman (2nd Generation U.S. MARINE, 3rd Generation American & PROUD OF IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
Such a plan will have to be approved by the Senate and it won't be. It would probably be in the form of a treaty which would require a 2/3 approval. I don't think that is possible.

You should go and read how close the US senate came to ratifying the bio-diversity treaty about ten years ago. These idiots were ready to sign something they hadn't not only read, but the appendix (which contained all the nasty stuff) wasn't even available yet from the UN. TRUST US!. Fortunately, a massive fax campain led by Dr. Michael Coffman and Senator Jesse Helms came to the rescue at the midnight hour.
65 posted on 07/16/2005 7:35:44 PM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Reagan thought highly of her.

You should too. You should read everything this lady has written.
66 posted on 07/16/2005 7:39:10 PM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

Yeah, yeah. I don't know why you suckers are so worried; don't you know President Tancredo is going to ride in and save us all at the end of the day? :)

Viva W.

-Dan

67 posted on 07/16/2005 9:35:03 PM PDT by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: twas
This all has been in the works for some time. It's accelerating now.

Henry Kissinger, a member of the executive committee of the Trilateral Commission and a longtime power in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), called the NAFTA vote the single most important decision that Congress would make during Mr. Clinton's first term. Indeed, Kissinger admitted in the Los Angeles Times in 1993 that passing NAFTA "will represent the most creative step toward a new world order taken by any group of countries since the end of the Cold War...." NAFTA "is not a conventional trade agreement," he said, "but the architecture of a new international system."

Over the past decade, many of Kissinger's Trilateralist and CFR brethren have expounded on how important this "new international system" is in constructing their subversive "new world order." Some of them openly admit that NAFTA and the FTAA can, and will, follow the sovereignty-destroying path blazed by the EU. Many of the most important revelations in this regard can be found in the pages of the CFR's journal, Foreign Affairs. In the Fall 1991 issue, for example, CFR member M. Delal Baer penned an article entitled "North American Free Trade," hinting at the hemispheric leviathan emerging from the murky depths.

"The creation of trinational dispute-resolution mechanisms and rule-making bodies on border and environmental issues may also be embryonic forms of more comprehensive structures," said Baer. "After all, international organizations and agreements like GATT and NAFTA by definition minimize assertions of sovereignty in favor of a joint rule-making authority." (Emphasis added.)

http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2002/05-06-2002/vo18no09_borders.htm

68 posted on 07/16/2005 11:28:45 PM PDT by KittyKares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TMSuchman

Not 7, 28.


69 posted on 07/17/2005 2:50:20 AM PDT by I_dmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TMSuchman

By their own testimony, they are still writing.

But seven years seems about right to me.


70 posted on 07/17/2005 7:11:49 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: tang-soo

I think a lot of Phyllis. It irritates the hell out of me that she's being trashed on this forum by a bunch of numbnuts.


71 posted on 07/17/2005 7:13:12 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Flux Capacitor
Hey Dan -- I see you digitally erased the lipstick and saliva marks from Dubya picture...

Nice job.

72 posted on 07/17/2005 7:14:55 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
I agree that this plan if taken as a whole could not pass at least not in the near future. A piecemeal approach including something short of open borders (i.e. A guest worker program so generous with mexico that, in paraphrase of Bushs words, the only people who would need to try to jump the border illegally would be criminals and terrorists.) could be possible in the near future. If we continue the preference that mexico has in our immigration policy then in 25 to 50 years then any plan to integrate the US and mexico would pass easily.
73 posted on 02/24/2006 3:07:59 PM PST by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mthom

Wow. That is a reply to a comment I made eight months ago. I may have changed my mind by now, but I haven't. :-)


74 posted on 02/24/2006 5:44:17 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
"U.S. sovereignty is being sold out" NO!!!!!! The American Dream which emodies all of our founding laws is what is being spread thourghout the world. At the present time it is losing to Marxism/Communism, which is growing in South America, Africa, and parts of Asia. Choose your side!
75 posted on 04/15/2006 11:12:10 PM PDT by Blake#1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; Borax Queen; Czar
Why is Congress, the Senate and the President considering the welfare of Mexican citizens before they listen to the will of the American people?

Tigers Eye: "It's all about 'human capital'."

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has just let the cat out of the bag about what's really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries. A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

"Community" means integrating the United States with the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. "Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada....

Ping!

Thanks for alerting me to this thread, Tigers Eye.

76 posted on 04/16/2006 6:59:46 AM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
"A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

That may be the plan.

Lets see what happens to it when the American people find out what's going on. We may have been dumbed down over the past 30 or 40 years, but we aren't dead yet.

77 posted on 04/16/2006 6:28:11 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Thanks for alerting me to this thread, Tigers Eye.

You're welcome.

78 posted on 04/16/2006 7:03:41 PM PDT by TigersEye (Sedition and treason are getting to be a Beltway fashion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Czar
we aren't dead yet.

Nope; and I'll go down kicking and screaming.

79 posted on 04/16/2006 7:07:35 PM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Flux Capacitor
ATTENTION!
ATTENCION, human capital of Norte America!

The United States of America
will henceforth be known as ...

BUSHMART

... where the doors are never closed and the shoppers are never hosed.

"Welcome to Bushmart, senor. Would you like a cart?"


80 posted on 04/16/2006 7:09:56 PM PDT by TigersEye (Sedition and treason are getting to be a Beltway fashion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson