1 posted on
07/15/2005 2:53:34 PM PDT by
bitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: writer33; Blurblogger; Tolik; neverdem; Smartass; CyberAnt
2 posted on
07/15/2005 2:54:37 PM PDT by
bitt
('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
To: bitt
LOL you mean he is the Dem's Karl Rove????
3 posted on
07/15/2005 2:54:39 PM PDT by
mware
("God is dead" -- Nietzsch"....... "Nope, you are"-- GOD)
To: bitt
big deal.
rush limbaugh went over some of his stuff a month ago. there's nothing there.
4 posted on
07/15/2005 2:55:52 PM PDT by
ken21
(it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
To: CHARLITE
5 posted on
07/15/2005 2:56:30 PM PDT by
bitt
('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
To: bitt
The Democrats don't have the truth on their side, so they try to use language to make people think the Democrats are something, they are not. They are communists and a commie by any other name...
6 posted on
07/15/2005 2:57:26 PM PDT by
QQQQQ
To: bitt
This is what you do when you have no ideas or moral sense. You play word games.
7 posted on
07/15/2005 2:59:29 PM PDT by
dervish
(freedom is a long distance race)
To: bitt
The crazy rats are hiring professional liars to determine their "core beliefs".
8 posted on
07/15/2005 3:02:10 PM PDT by
FormerACLUmember
(Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
To: bitt
he wrote “Don't Think of an Elephant”-- a book about politics and language based on his own linguistic theories.
These guys are nuts. The title of the book says to me that we are still framing the issues.
13 posted on
07/15/2005 3:05:11 PM PDT by
PeterPrinciple
(Seeking the truth here folks.)
To: bitt
Chomsky's a linguist, too. What is it with linguistics?
14 posted on
07/15/2005 3:05:16 PM PDT by
Rastus
To: bitt
In other words tell the American people that the dems believe in all the same things that they do and maybe they won`t notice when they do just the opposite.
Got to remember they consider all of us stupid so why wouldn`t this fit into their game plan.
17 posted on
07/15/2005 3:09:47 PM PDT by
carlr
To: bitt
Lackoff . . . as Rush says, "Rhymes with."
21 posted on
07/15/2005 3:13:23 PM PDT by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news)
To: FBD
"George Lakoff" Sayyyy that rhymes with whackoff!!
...someone best tell Rush. :o)
23 posted on
07/15/2005 3:14:56 PM PDT by
Landru
(The bravery of being out of range...)
To: bitt
Liberals have been trying to reframe the language for years. That's why we now have "undocumented immigrants" instead of "illegal aliens" and "homeless people" instead of "vagrants" or "bums". But, guess what? Unless you change what's being described, people don't fall for it. Nobody wants a "homeless person" sitting next to them on a subway any more than tney wanted a "bum" sitting next to them. Why? Because those two terms still ultimately describe the same thing.
To: bitt
If it's in the Times, I don't believe it.
To: bitt
I hope Matt Bai makes plenty of bucks off the suckers not wanting to look inward, or question their own self-regarded smarts.
Just like the person/people who sold the DNC on the idea "talk radio" was behind the lack of gains in 2002, coincidently just after some Democrats were complaining the DNC and McAuliffe were the problems.
26 posted on
07/15/2005 3:17:36 PM PDT by
Shermy
To: bitt
Language alone is not enough to sell people on bad ideas. Except for really stupid people.
30 posted on
07/15/2005 3:30:41 PM PDT by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: bitt
The NY Times is late on this issue. The SF Chronicle had this story about 6 months ago, Rush talked about it extensively. He is a prof at UC Berkeley.
To: bitt
Herr Goebels was a cunning linguist too.
To: bitt
Is he a snake handler? That has to be his main criteria when handling the dims.
35 posted on
07/15/2005 3:54:43 PM PDT by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
To: bitt
He forgot to mention that the Republicans are also skilled supporting issues that the majority of Americans will vote for....
*giggle*
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson