Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Old Hoosier
She wouldn't have to accept immunity.

Yes, she would. That's precisely why immunity is granted in the first place -- to remove any legal obstacles/limitations to her testifying. Once a witness is granted this immunity, they must either testify or face prosecution for contempt of court and/or obstruction of justice.

152 posted on 07/15/2005 1:04:25 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

You don't have to accept immunity.


166 posted on 07/15/2005 1:40:30 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson