Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oldleft; joanie-f
Actually...this is not a vanity at all. It is a well documented compilation meant to educate. If you have factual and documented refutation, please cite it.

As to the 1950's and 1960's nuclear tests in space (there were nine space tests I believe)...the types of components used in those years, both military and civilian, were not as suceptable to EMP damage as the discrete electronic compoinents we have come to abjectly rely on today. That is one reason why the impact back then was much more minimal than what it would be today.

63 posted on 07/15/2005 11:47:05 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head
..the types of components used in those years, both military and civilian, were not as suceptable to EMP damage as the discrete electronic compoinents we have come to abjectly rely on today.
Today's micro-electronics input/output pins are, however, protected intrinsic ESD circuity; typically fast clamping diodes to ground and the Vcc or Vdd supply rails ... this works surprising well in practice AND is an under-rated factor in most 'predictions' performed by arm-chair EMP analysts ...

212 posted on 07/29/2005 7:31:42 PM PDT by _Jim (<--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson