Posted on 07/15/2005 5:46:12 AM PDT by Richard Poe
Very nice book....
It's just a shame..that the American Sheeple just keep getting sheared.
I wonder how Mr. Rodriguez...is doing these days. That whole episode had to be a foul smelling eye-opener for him. I hope and pray it didn't ruin his "values".
FRegards,
Thanks! Amazon.com is selling a limited number of copies at a special bargain price of $7.99 (regular price: $25.99) — in case you're interested.
I bought your book but it has not been delivered yet. I look forward to reading it.
Thank you for the link at comment #13 at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1442911/posts?page=6#6
By his "values," do you mean his leftwing, bohemian countercultural values? LOL. I'd have to imagine the experience had some impact in that area.
Then again, his persecution might have just reinforced his bohemianism, a la Serpico.
Someone should make a movie about Miquel Rodriguez. Oliver Stone would be the perfect director. Too bad Stone works for the bad guys.
Unfortunately, I wouldn't count Starr out yet. If he wanted to meet with the Clintons, he must have wanted something from them. A single word from Hillary could transform Starr into the Democrats' favorite candidate for the Supreme Court, and Starr knows it.
Hillary's endorsement would compel the Dems to embrace Starr just as they suddenly turned around and embraced Alberto Gonzales, whom they had previously accused of being a latter-day Josef Mengele.
Think of what an asset Starr could be to the Dems. In a horse trade over Supreme Court appointments, the Dems could count Starr as a "conservative." In exchange for approving Starr, they could demand that Bush appoint an ultra-leftist radical to the court. Then the Dems would get a twofer — two Supreme Court justices, one radical, one "conservative" — but both taking orders from Hillary.
Bvllshit.
NObody who's ever been there would ever believe 'Snopes' is non-partisan or does not have an agenda.
Go there yourself and findout.
Starr has been "Quayled"... I dont think he will ever make the short list
...For years, major media had painted Starr as a ruthless Republican partisan, a Christian fanatic consumed with moral outrage against the Clintons. Why, then, would Starr tell an influential Democrat operative that he wanted to socialize with the Clintons? And what was he doing chumming around with Democrat operatives in the first place?...
I've said all along, Starr got paid by the same people who bought the Clintons and over half the Senate.
The real scandal was the Chinese money.
Still is.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Snopes recieving some financial aid as well.
Wonderful book. Please add me to your ping list.
I've read several versions of the origin story, and don't know which one to believe.
Redbob responded: "Bvllshit. NObody who's ever been there would ever believe 'Snopes' is non-partisan or does not have an agenda. Go there yourself and find out."
Take it easy, Redbob! I agree with you. The word "putatively" means "supposedly."
Well, maybe. But the standards are different.
Quayle was running for elected office. Starr's appointment would be an inside job.
To get a Supreme Court appointment, Starr would only need the "consent" of the Senate. If the Dems gave him the thumbs up (at Hillary's command), Starr would be a shoo-in. The Republicans would approve Starr out of sheer moral exhaustion and physical relief at being able to appoint someone without the usual eyeball-gouging match with the Dems.
LOL!!
Well..that's why I placed values in quotation marks. What I tried to say was...I hope it didn't mess up his sense of right, and continuing to do the "right" thing.
( Even some lefty bohemian's have that sense, don't they? hehehe )
FRegards,
Red Starr on the SCOTUS?
That's all we need is another Chinese agent in a position of power.
Please add me to the ping list.
Selling China a complete intact Naval Base in California was not small potatoes.. Didn't happen, but almost did happen.. and a hundred other crimes was committed by the Clintons..
To this day Washington D.C. is a sewer in every way.. politically and even in local government.. It should be raised and re-built..
And Bush is a, "Unite'er and Not a Divide'er".. protecting the cabal at the top of this food chain.. Bush KEPT most all the Clinton appointees after he was inaugerated.. Putting the RINO Alberto Gonzalez in as AG is a bad sign.. But then, Bush has spent most of his term Uniteing with democrats.. From the moment Bush came out to run in the primarys I was thinking he was like "Ken Starr".. a shill to replace the main "perp".. The war in Iraq was a brilliant diversion from "our borders", still is..
The democrats SHOULD be loving George Bush.. but the MSM has done him like Ken Starr.. and it has WORKED TOO.. Starr was a shill and Bush is a shill.. Bushbots are so stupid.. OR maybe they are SHILLS TOO...
Would you please put me on this ping list?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.