[Protect the Bill of Rights]

Right
I do not like thinking that either.

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

Wait a minute...scratch that
It is early in the morning and I am not thinking straight.

Powell, yes. BUT the facts do not change. It is not classified. Powell has not made any statements about it. So there are no contradictions for MSM to salivate for.

So Powell would be my guess if it is as said "non-partisan." If Powell is the source, MSM cannot accuse him of being Bush's attack dog. MSM cannot accuse him of purposely smearing the Wilson's for revenge.

Powell as the source would be great. It would be nothing more than setting the record straight.

[GoLightly]

If it was Powell, it's no big deal, for the reasons you stated in one of your later responses to me. He testified to the GJ & fits with "nonpartisan", high level Exec. label to a tee, which is why I think he's Novak's original source.

I do not think he is Miller's original source, which is why she's sitting in jail. I think she got her info from... someone in the Kerry Kamp. This story was supposed to be part of a better orchestrated pre-election Bush bash. Novak's dabbling with the same story threw a wrench in the whole works.