Replies

For the sake of argument, if they did that what would they gain? We're looking to make more pickups in '06. By then we'll likely have enough real Republicans to break the filibuster without the RINO's.

1. After Cooper's testimony yesterday, Rove's lawyer stated at a press conference that Cooper gave "truthful" testimony today. Why would he say that if something good didn't come out of it.

2. Also right after that testimony, Bush made a point to publicly show his support for Rove in front of the press this morning.

3. Clinton said to wait until the investigation is over before throwing rocks.

4. DIMS made fools of themselves today with that Wilson Press conference and that idiotic amendment to the HLS bill.

Therefore I think the Times is trying to avoid anymore political damage to their party by coming out with something now before it totally gets out of hand for them. Which is another reason why they have been rather tame in criticizing