Skip to comments.
NY TIMES CLAIMS EXCLUSIVE NEW DETAILS OF EVENTS SURROUNDING CIA LEAK, SOURCES TELL DRUDGE...
Drudge Report ^
| July 14, 2005
| Drudge
Posted on 07/14/2005 5:29:59 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
NY TIMES CLAIMS EXCLUSIVE NEW DETAILS OF EVENTS SURROUNDING CIA LEAK, SOURCES TELL DRUDGE... DEVELOPING LATE OUT OF WASHINGTON... MORE...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antinuke; cialeak; fakebutaccurate; joewilson; ncc; schumer; stand; wand; will
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 621-638 next last
To: Pukin Dog
Well, if you agree it's not going to happen, why are you pushing that idea?
121
posted on
07/14/2005 6:06:01 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
To: Pukin Dog
Impeachment is not the goal. Delaying the confirmation of Bush Judges is. You are probably correct here - Though this will have no impact on judges - It will be old news by mid August -
To: Snapping Turtle
Smell a rat or monkey in the wood pile. NYT has not been honest yet.
To: blogblogginaway
This should be interesting. The NYT knows who Miller's source is, yet they are posturing in lockstep with the DNC. If Rove is the source, then their behavior is highly unethical since they are persecuting their source. If Rove is not their source, then they are joining in an attack they know not to be true. And they do this as one of their own sits in jail. Have they no decency?
124
posted on
07/14/2005 6:07:09 PM PDT
by
Hoodat
( Silly Dems)
To: defconw
This is what El Rushbo has been driving at for 4 days now... Pinchy would never throw his own under the bus unless the source was seriously embarassing to the DemO'Libs.
125
posted on
07/14/2005 6:07:23 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
To: operation clinton cleanup
When it became clear that Sandy Burger was being treated so gently by the Bush Administration's Justice Department, I suspected that the Administration might expect an indictment in this case and wants their person to be treated as gently.
I don't think it will happen though. The Republicans always get treated worse because of the media.
To: Pukin Dog
I agree. Their goal is to push the second and third SC nomination hearings beyond the midterm elections.
To: TennTuxedo
Same old NYRag...Get it out there..true or not...
keep the Imus program snowed....besides the gullible
NewYorkers....Hillary snowed them and they are too dumb
to realize it...Kerry Supporters..that's all you need
to know...Jake
To: thoughtomator
"Truth, Sir, is a cow, which will yield such people no more milk, and so they are gone to milk the bull."
Samuel Johnson
129
posted on
07/14/2005 6:08:47 PM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: Howlin
For more than one reason.
1) It won't get past Denny and Delay
2) The administration has done nothing to warrant impeachment.
The Dems can throw a tantrum the next four years and it will only serve to further turn the American people off. If they weren't willing to support Clinton's impeachment with cause, they certainly are not in a mood to support a witchhunt.
To: syriacus
Do you know if Gold mines also produce uranium?
After only one year on the job Wilson decided to retire and go into the private sector because "we wanted to have kids, and felt that it had become very difficult to live off two government salaries." He set up a consultancy, J. C. Wilson headquarters of the Rock Creek Corporation AN INVESTMENT FIRM OF WHICH LITTLE IS KNOWN. Willisson's right-wing critics have been quick to condemn the affiliation as "musk," though Wilson does not work for Rock Creek and merely rents space and facilities there.
'I HAVE A NUMBER OF CLIENTS, AND BASICALLY WE HELP THEM WITH THEIR SORT OF INVESTMENTS IN COUNTRIES LIKE NIGER," explains Wilson. "Niger was of some interest because it has some gold deposits coming onstream. WE HAD SOME CLIENTS WHO WERE INTERESTED IN GOLD.... We were looking to set up a gond-mine company out of London."
http://www.jimgilliam.com/2004/01/vanity_fairs_profile_on_joseph_wilson_and_valerie_plame.php
And oh, seems Wilson was against the war ....
During the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, Wilson had taken a measured public positionviewing weapons of mass destruction as a danger but considering military action as a last resort. He has seemed much more critical of the administration since revealing his role in Niger," Novak observes.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/993741/posts
And did I mention both Plames AND her boss sorta thought this uranium thing was well, "objectionable" and how did she say......"crazy"?
Cheney and his chief of staff. Lewis Libby, visited the CIA several times at Langley and told the staff to make more of an effort to find evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and to uncover Iraqi attempts to acquire nuclear capabilities. One of the people who objected most fervently to what he saw as "Intimidation" according to one former CIA case officer, was ALAN FOLEY, then ghd HEAD OF THE WEAPONS INTELLIGENCE, Non-Pfoliferation and Arms Control Center. HE WAS VALERIE PLAME'S BOSS.
http://www.rasmusen.org/x/archives/000029.html
The report said Plame told committee staffers that she relayed the CIA's request to her husband, saying, "THERE'S THIS CRAZY REPORT" about a purported deal for Niger to sell uranium to Iraq. The committee found Wilson had made an earlier trip to Niger in 1999 for the CIA, also at his wife's suggestion.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A39834-2004Jul9.html
To: defconw
I think so, someone said something about Cooper's sister working with Hill before (maybe when Wilson worked in Clinton administration as ambassador). I couldn't find anything, maybe you can. FYI, did you see the campaign contribution list whereby Plume outed herself by using both names?
132
posted on
07/14/2005 6:09:16 PM PDT
by
AliVeritas
(Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
To: canadiancapitalist
Thats right, because almost no one is confirmed after that, in deference to the 'incoming executive'.
133
posted on
07/14/2005 6:09:26 PM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: TennTuxedo
Don't forget those ohhh so important missing explosives in Iraq.. boy.. right before the election they were soooo important...
/me listens at the crickets singing
134
posted on
07/14/2005 6:09:33 PM PDT
by
Dubya-M-Dees
(The filibuster has become the tool of the sore loser.)
To: blogblogginaway
This must be more President Bush National Guard stuff. Maybe they found his barber.
To: Revererdrv
Know this, Fitzgerald is watching. He is ticked off with the NY Times as it is.
136
posted on
07/14/2005 6:09:48 PM PDT
by
mware
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche........ "Nope, you are"-- GOD)
To: xcamel
Rush is usually right and I have been listening to him for years the other day he was saying soemthing at the exact same time I was thinking it! Rush mind meld?
137
posted on
07/14/2005 6:10:05 PM PDT
by
defconw
(ALLEN IN 08)
To: Hoodat
Perhaps Judith Miller has NO source (she simply used herself as the Source...and the NYT went along with it)
To: montag813
13 down: Asian ape (6 letters).
139
posted on
07/14/2005 6:10:24 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(There is no positive correlation between the ability to write, act, sing or dance and being right)
To: canadiancapitalist
For the sake of argument, if they did that what would they gain? We're looking to make more pickups in '06. By then we'll likely have enough real Republicans to break the filibuster without the RINO's.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 621-638 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson