Posted on 07/14/2005 5:29:59 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
NY TIMES CLAIMS EXCLUSIVE NEW DETAILS OF EVENTS SURROUNDING CIA LEAK, SOURCES TELL DRUDGE... DEVELOPING LATE OUT OF WASHINGTON... MORE...
D-Women's Action for New Directions
WAND empowers women to act politically to reduce violence and militarism, and redirect excessive military resources toward unmet human and environmental needs.
They have their own PAC, and their own section for D-Women Legislators.
WAND also sponsors: STAND
National youth conference on nuclear issues: August 15-21, 2005 The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and its partners invite you to participate in “Think Outside the Bomb,” a gathering of young leaders, disarmament experts, veteran activists, and artists. August 15-21, 2005 at the University of California, Santa Barbara. For application, click here
and...
Leave My Child Alone! A Family Privacy Campaign to Protect Our High School Students From Unwanted Military Recruiting: WAND and WiLL are working with other groups to raise awareness about a provision hidden in the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). Click here for more.... and then I just had to look:
State of the Union 2005: WAND encourages "active listening" as an act of patriotism
WAND is providing a State of the Union Listening Guide to facilitate this process. The Guide consists of a series of handy charts, which are easy to print out and fill in. The charts highlight specific topics to listen for, along with spaces for taking notes and recording conclusions. If possible, please make copies of the completed Guide to mail to the President and members of Congress. Addresses are listed at the bottom.
The 2005 State of the Union address is a great opportunity for meaningful action. When you tune in to the President's speech, take care to listen up. It's a vitally important task, an exercise of our responsibility as citizens, an act of patriotism.
See Freep Thread: Moms tell recruiters: ‘Leave My Child Alone!’ People's Weekly World ^ | 06-30-05 | Tim Wheeler
I wonder which liar "reported" that? We know they have been so truthful so far. /sarcasm
I don't think anyone knows who is under any criminal risk in this investigation. If they do they aren't saying.
BTW, did we ever find out who was impersonating Terrance J. Wilkinson and feeding false 'leaks' about "Bush lied" to the media almost exactly 2 years ago?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/993741/posts?page=247#238
The NYSlimes is being pretty stubborn about updating their page. Poor Drudge.
Clinton said Wilson voted for Bush 41, not Clinton.
I haven't followed this all that closely, and I haven't read all the responses on this string, but here's a question.
Tonight I heard Wilson on Wolf Blitzer's show stating that his wife wasn't undercover when she was "outed." So where's the crime, where's the scandal, and why is this still being discussed, at least in relation to Rove?
It would seem that after this revalation, this whole thing should die. Where am I wrong?
Do we conclude that journalists are above the law? Is that the principle?
You're not wrong. Once again, "Good Ole Mr. Wilson" screwed up. Mouth in motion before mind in gear.
Fact is that he states in his own book that she hadn't been a covert op for many years while they had their little twins.
The law is very specific. She had to be uncover/out of the country/signaled out for protection, etc.
Did not apply.
OK, should I keep on refreshing the Drudge link every 30 seconds throughout the night or go to sleep and check in the morning?
The prosecutor is looking into conspiracy, perjury, or obstruction. That's the guess of the insiders. Or he just wants to close the case. Who knows?
Found this, have no clue what this site is:
Following a panel that included former Ambassador Joe Wilson, a question by EIR's Lawrence Freeman to Wilson brought the Dick Cheney issue to the table for the first time. "Is it the policy of this organization to not mention Cheney?" Freeman asked. The audience broke out into laughter and applause, and Wilson took the opportunity to say that it is not his policy to leave out Cheney.
Wilson—who had just spoken about how his mission in February 2002 debunked the report of Iraqi purchases of yellowcake uranium from Niger, and how that report had made him the target of an Administration vendetta—said that he has three targets: Donald Rumsfeld, Karl Rove, and Dick Cheney. The audience was delighted—but, a second speaker, Flynt Leverett, opposed Freeman's question, returning to the "party line" of CAP and the DLC: Bush—not Cheney—is responsible.
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:qoJSokzeBSQJ:www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3043soros_dems.html+soros+joe+wilson&hl=en&client=firefox-a
Was this a NAMBLA meeting?
BWWAAAHHHAAAHAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!
The Slimes hasn't updated their site. That's all Drudge is waiting on. His "scoops" aren't always the very top NYSlimes story. I've been checking their frontpage and in National and Washington sections just to see if a new story on this is available. Not yet.
I think that's a Lyndon Larouche website.
OK, so Rove should be off the hook, which I never thought he was hooked on in the first place.
I think somebody else said the timing is wrong for an anti-Bush story. Otherwise it would be coming out on Saturday night, in the Sunday paper, just in time for the Sunday talk shows, and not buried on a Friday.
Add to that corruption and the list is complete.
They could be now .. but in the beginning they weren't and I can't see any reason why they .. or at least Joe wouldn't be a witness
But I just can't find any reporting of it
That picture of Rehnquist on the Drudge site makes it looks like Rehnquist is having a heavy duty stare-down with a squirrel. Since I have been looking at that page for the last 90 minutes, I have had much time to analyze the picture.
LOL. Story will be the same in the AM.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.