Posted on 07/14/2005 1:50:45 PM PDT by Pukin Dog
Don’t ask me, because you know I won’t tell you how I came across this information.
Here is the scoop.
This is all about the Supreme Court.
With the knowledge that Rove was Matthew Cooper’s background source regarding the Plame incident, no matter the fact that no laws were broken, the Democrats leaped upon the matter as a way for Democrats and the MSM to possibly prevent Bush from changing the makeup of the Supreme Court. Under normal circumstances, Democrats cannot stop Bush from reshaping the Supreme Court, and that has Democrats terrified. They cannot sustain a Filibuster without Frist invoking the Nuclear Option on them, so they only have one last option, which is now underway.
The Democrats must demonize Bush to the degree that they can then begin their long-awaited impeachment articles, with the MSM in tow. If Congress can introduce articles of impeachment against Bush, then the MSM will demand that Bush postpone any nominations to the Supreme Court until the matter is decided. It is the only hope they have left of preventing a Conservative Supreme Court from taking hold, and if they do not accomplish this, the flow of money into Democratic coffers will stop instantaneously.
Next week, you will begin to hear Democrats suggesting that if Bush does not fire Karl Rove, then he is guilty of “Obstruction of Justice” and “Lying to the American People” in order to protect a friend. The Media will play along dutifully, because it was there idea in the first place.
Forget about Judith Miller.
Because the Special Prosecutor has asked the White House not to discuss the matter, no one will be able to inform Miller or the NY Times on how Miller should lie to save herself. Without that knowledge, the Times will not let her testify at all. They are paying her to be silent, and it is they who are actually guilty of ‘Obstruction of Justice’ Miller knows who the leaker is, and you all know who I believe that person to be.
What you all are about to see, is the most coordinated, vicious attack ever in the history of Politics against this administration, because those involved have everything at stake. Without control of the Supreme Court, the Liberal agenda is dead for the next 30-40 years. All of their Environmental nonsense, Abortion, Private Property, Affirmative Action and Civil Rights issues go right down the tubes.
The Bush Administration is aware of what is to come, and might be able to prevent it with a little ‘inside baseball’ but the looniest on the left will attempt this no matter what the outcome.
Expect editorials next week, arguing whether or not it is fair for a president who “stole the first election” and won the second election by the “smallest margin of any incumbent President” who is “embroiled in a National Security Scandal” to be deciding on the makeup of the Supreme Court. At the same time, Liberal Senators will begin to suggest that Conformation hearings on anyone Bush selects should be postponed until the investigations are over. Unfortunately for our side, they have an alley in one Arlen Specter. They will be leaning heavily on him to go along with delayed hearings. Specter is already angry with Bush over the Stem-cell research issue.
Will it work? No. Why? Because Bush understands the law, and also understands (with Rove’s help) that no matter how loud and long the Democrats scream, they and the MSM really cant do anything about the Supreme Court, but can effect public opinion. Bush, by telling Republicans to shut up about his choice, has set precedent for when he tells (by his Supreme Court selections) the Democrats the same thing. If he ignores both sides, he can just choose who he wants, and that is exactly what he will do.
So get ready for an ugly, ugly Summer and Fall. Don’t expect to hear much from Bush on Rove, or the Courts after he makes his selections. Republicans in Congress will also be silent (except Specter and Hagel) and will not risk their own re-elections and legacies to side with Democrats this time round.
So there it is, take it or leave it. I wont answer any questions about how or where I got the information, so don’t ask me.
-PD
Thank you. You and I are on the same wavelength here. The only question is, is Mr. Fitzgerald?
Sheesh. Calm yourself. If it NOT a crime to say that, then the issue is moot. "Moot" - of no practical importance, irrelevant. Get a grip on yourself or get a dictionary.
In its heyday (late 1980s?), Spy Magazine had a running "blind" item about an ambitious NYT girl reporter who got lots of inside stuff by "sleeping" with powerful politicians. It was clear to some of us that they were referring to Ms Miller.
It's time to bitch slap the dims and rinos into reality. I'm sick of them.
How did he "leak"?
Yes I did, and thank you for bringing it to my attention. I missed that when I posted it.
I've been hearing this a lot lately. Are you a reporter?
Fascinating. Thanks for sharing the information, although at the risk of seeming "catty," I have to ask myself just why anyone would want to engage in such activity with this particular female. Calendar "Girl of the year" she's not..........and wasn't in the 1980's, either.
Thanks, aculeus!
Char :)
I am HTML illiterate, so don't do links, but you really need to read the thread here and especially Fedora's recent posts on it, with the title, IS THIS A SET UP? THE WILSON something or other. He suggests that Miller had something to do with the "sexed up " BBC reporters FRAUDULANT burbling, which he later retraction but which, at the time, was quite something. .
I drink out of bottles with lids so I'm not tempted to do that. Lololol. :-)
actually the left works on the same assumption.
They try and indoctrinate the young legal minds full of mush so when they go out in the real world, as much of the left wing legal indoctrination sticks without them even thinking it through.
The ones that are so indoctrinated they can't even function in the real world go back to the law schools and become legal professors.
I see.
It makes sense to me, PD. They can't enact their agenda through legislative means, so they rely on their activist judge buddies to help them out. If Bush is able to appoint more conservative judges to the Supreme Court, that would really upset their apple cart.
BTW, you forgot to use your newly minted ping list!
Pelosi has already said just that today on Fox it was reported.
Lord, I hope you are right, but we have put misplaced faith in such investigations before. The saving grace IMO is that Mr. Fitzgerald has a real axe to grind with Judith Miller and obviously does not care for the media types. I just don't want to put too many eggs in that basket. I do think that Rove will not be indicted, nor will anyone else be indicted for violation the law against revealing names of covert operatives, because it's blindingly obvious that Plame was not covert. The only indictments I can see are for perjury, hopefully of Joe Wilson and Matt Cooper. And an unindicted co-conspirator charge against Judith Miller.
I think...you might be right!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.