Posted on 07/14/2005 1:50:45 PM PDT by Pukin Dog
exactly - Bush said someone would have had to break the law - something the MSM always leaves out about what he said
I wonder if the birdie was the canary in the mine.
Something like that would certainly be a result.
What the hell are you two smoking? Are you suggesting that Bush was the leaker?????
you sound like a lib that wants to read into the constitution rather than just read what it says
Ahhh, I see. You like to throw fight with me bombs.
Rove is innocent!!!! If you're so pig-headed that you can't see that, or you hate Bush and Rove so much that it is blinding you to that fact, I'm wasting my time on you.
Go fight with someone else.
Get specific on my "error(s)" or STFU!
The Left Wing loonies are dead, Fatwa, think-about-nothing-else-but serious about trying to impeach Bush. Ever since the Clinton impeachment debacle, they have promised themselves that the next GOPer as to be president would get the treatment. Too bad Clinton was impeached on the basis of (or I should say, ONLY on the basis of) the Lewinsky lies when there were things like taking dirty money from the ChiComs in return for secrets and spying "rights," filegate, letting his wife interfere with government business and who knows what other crimes. Well, here we are. We need to shut them down before they can start.
Then according to you, Rove and any other federal employee who mentions George Tenent or Porter Goss should be fired?
How much do you know about exactly HOW the government works? Obviously not very much if you don't know that imformation is swamped 24/7 there.........that is ALL he did.
But, of course, you, like the Democrats, would just LOVE to find ANYTHING to trash Bush with.
1) The overly-cocky Rove committed the unpardonable, mortal (Bush) sin of LEAKING!
2) Bush clearly stated (unless you allow Clinton like qualifications) that the leaker would be CANNED!
Botta Bing, Botta Boom!
PS ....... who the hell do you think you are, the FR Pope?
The obvious answer to that question is that somebody ELSE told her -- and that somebody is a big fat Democrat.
Pukin, I don't doubt it. there are no depths so low that the Dims can't plumb them.
Charlite - PING
Much speculation that it was leaked by Miller. Does anyone think Novak may have told Rove. Miller to Novak to Rove? He did write the original story. Oh hell, my head is distractingly spinning.
pUKIN dOG NAILS IT (HE HAS AN ANNOYING KNACK FOR DOING THAT)
SPREAD THE WORD
PD....how is the Repub controlled Congress going to bring articles of impeachment...?
Like I said, we "modified" the rules... And the dem leadership would be "Amoral Evil."
Mark
Assumes facts not in evidence.
(1) If Plame wasn't an active, covert agent, the leak wasn't illegal.
(2) Even the WP reported that reporters might have told government officials (possibly including Rove, but this isn't mentioned) Plame's name. In which case, Rove isn't the leaker, even notwithstanding (1).
(3) What's up with Miller and the NY Slimes? They asked for an investigation, and now their own reporter sits in jail for failure to testify before a grand jury. Gee, do you suppose Plame (or Wilson) told Miller of Plame's employment, and then Miller told Rove, who then told Novak? This scenario explains at least two things: Why Rove and Bush are so confident, and why Miller refuses to testify.
No Pukin Dog is Karl Rove. Isn't it obvious? Both of their names have eight letters!
No, but I am the spelling champion of VF-143.
We're close to agreement.
Rove is an innocent jerk that opened his yap when he shouldn't have.
Bush is an innocent jerk that got hoist on his own petard (his obsession with leak prevention).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.