Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

He claims there are at least 5,000 sleeper cell individuals, gearing up to unleash multiple nuclear attacks on primary cities, very, very soon. Mr. Williams is meeting with Colorado Senator Tancredo and will address the Congress with his findings.

Michael Savage website as of this posting hasn't updated his site, as of yet, with yesterdays program. Check back when he does for more information on this.

1 posted on 07/14/2005 12:24:34 PM PDT by Sweetjustusnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Sweetjustusnow

Heh, great way to sell a book!


2 posted on 07/14/2005 12:26:04 PM PDT by BrooklynGOP (www.logicandsanity.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

Um right. If Al Qaeda had even one suitcase nuke, they'd have used it long ago. And the notion of 5000 sleeper cells is ridiculous.


3 posted on 07/14/2005 12:26:58 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

This same old rumor has been posted here in the past.


4 posted on 07/14/2005 12:26:58 PM PDT by Kenton ("Life is tough, and it's really tough when you're stupid" - Damon Runyon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

And they're using them "very, very soon" instead of now because?


5 posted on 07/14/2005 12:27:00 PM PDT by Snake65 (Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

Suitcase nukes, while they did/do exist, are extremely advanced forms of nuclear explosive. If they aren't maintained by a highly-skilled maintenance organization on a regular basis, they degrade to the point that they are nothing more than unusually heavy luggage. Even if some jihidiot managed to get his hands on one, the odds of it being armed, and in a good enough state of maintenance to go off, are practically nil. It is even more unlikely that any terrorist organization has access to a Nation advanced enough to produce a new one for them, since the US, the old Soviet Union, and possibly the Israelis are the only ones who ever developed such weapons or are/were capable of such.


6 posted on 07/14/2005 12:28:03 PM PDT by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

This book sure gets advertised a lot here


9 posted on 07/14/2005 12:28:19 PM PDT by neutrality
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

Calling Jack Bauer !


10 posted on 07/14/2005 12:28:36 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Register to vote as a Dem! You get to vote in their primaries and it screws up their polling data!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow
We like the subs!

11 posted on 07/14/2005 12:28:36 PM PDT by evets (You're welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

The guy is a nutjob. So is Savage. Tancredo should run, not walk, away from this guy.


13 posted on 07/14/2005 12:29:06 PM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow
compilation of data based on; FBI, CIA, Vice President Cheney, Homeland Security, Attorney General Ashcroft and news sources

Uh huh. Anybody besides me going to bet that the only source for "Al Qaeda Suitcase Nukes in the US" is "news" sources like WorldNutDaily?

I know one thing -- I'm not going to read this book to find out.

15 posted on 07/14/2005 12:29:27 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

If nuclear devices are set off by Islamic extremists in this country Mecca will be reduced to a glob of radioactive glass in less than 12 hours ... guaranteed.


16 posted on 07/14/2005 12:29:52 PM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

Savage hammering home the fact that he is off the deep end.


17 posted on 07/14/2005 12:29:55 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

I hope that they don't consider Oklahoma City to be a major city.


19 posted on 07/14/2005 12:30:19 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

So we can blame you for the absurd title of this thread?


21 posted on 07/14/2005 12:31:32 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow
I wonder if he mentions that, due to the maintenance requirements, and suitcase nukes would be likely useless.


Scared Bunny Blog
Not for the timid

24 posted on 07/14/2005 12:32:05 PM PDT by sharktrager (My life is like a box of chocolates, but someone took all the good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow
If they have all this stuff and people, what are they waiting for? Why not detonate during last year's election, or on Inauguration Day, or during the Super Bowl, or on July 4th? Why allow the Great Satan to continue to focus it's resources overseas in Iraq and Afghanistan, picking off/up Al Qaeda operatives everyday? What are they waiting for?

Maybe this story, while possible, is more likely - bunk.

27 posted on 07/14/2005 12:33:47 PM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

And they are waiting for?


28 posted on 07/14/2005 12:33:56 PM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

Those who are purveying this story are staggeringly irresponsible, and have destroyed any credibility they had as journalists.

Nukes aren't easy to handle, they don't preserve well, and the fact that we haven't been nuked (nor has Israel) is virtual proof that Islamists don't have them. There is nothing in their history to suggest that they would hold back for an instant, if they did have them.


29 posted on 07/14/2005 12:34:34 PM PDT by thoughtomator (For all you love to survive, Islam must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow

..err on the side of caution, even if this individual did just drop out of a spaceship.

We just can't afford to have any mushroom clouds over our cities.


32 posted on 07/14/2005 12:35:11 PM PDT by WalterSkinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sweetjustusnow; Southack

Ping


33 posted on 07/14/2005 12:35:13 PM PDT by Irontank (Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson