Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Bold and underlining added by me.
1 posted on 07/14/2005 3:33:02 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing
An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's description at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped.

2 posted on 07/14/2005 3:34:18 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
The paper was written by Yiban Xu, a post-doctoral research associate in the School of Nuclear Engineering, and Adam Butt, a graduate research assistant in both nuclear engineering and the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

What's in a name? :D

3 posted on 07/14/2005 3:35:39 AM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ahayes

Hmm. . .


4 posted on 07/14/2005 3:37:14 AM PDT by ahayes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Holy ultrasonic cleaner, Batman!


5 posted on 07/14/2005 3:38:48 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
This is really good news. I'm just waiting to see how the libs will try to demonize this energy source. After all, we can't have everyone in the world live like the US. We'll eventually run out of deuterium. Isn't that what the Nazis used in their early experiments with nuclear weapons?

Yada, yada, yada. . . .

6 posted on 07/14/2005 3:40:24 AM PDT by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Go Boilers!


7 posted on 07/14/2005 3:42:53 AM PDT by HoosierFather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

w00t!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this a different method than the widely reviled Utah research from over a decade ago?


8 posted on 07/14/2005 3:43:52 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

"1,000 million earth atmospheres"

Uh... wouldn't that be like one billion earth atmospheres.


15 posted on 07/14/2005 4:01:22 AM PDT by unlearner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

it looks like a well conducted experiment, with isolated variables, and the switchup of D-acetone for acetone seems pretty conclusive.
however... unless I missed something... I see no mention of power output vs. power input.
were they not interested in this aspect in this round of experimentation?


24 posted on 07/14/2005 5:08:28 AM PDT by King Prout (I'd say I missed ya, but that'd be untrue... I NEVER MISS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Correct me if I'm wrong. Why is it so screamingly difficult to confirm or deny any of these fusion experiments? If there's fusion, there's Helium.

We're able to detect Helium on the sun but can't detect it in a lab?


28 posted on 07/14/2005 5:41:42 AM PDT by djf (Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

I suspect that we should be putting more federal funding into this and less into hydrogen powered autos which have enormous engineering show-stoppers.


34 posted on 07/14/2005 6:01:39 AM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

How "statistically" significant?


41 posted on 07/14/2005 6:33:03 AM PDT by wotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
We had a freeper who was working on Cold Fusion when he was murdered. I know remember his name. Was this method different from what he was working on?
48 posted on 07/14/2005 8:35:01 AM PDT by armymarinemom (My sons freed Iraqi and Afghanistan Honor Roll students.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Development of a low-cost thermonuclear fusion generator would offer the potential for a new, relatively safe and low-polluting energy source

Sure. Unlimited free fuel, unlimited power. That's the template. A lot of con games are based on conversion of scarcity to surplus by converting what you have a lot of [dust in the desert] to something you have little of [water in the desert].

Philosopher's stone, convert pewter to gold--send $$$$$$

49 posted on 07/14/2005 9:50:47 AM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry; Squantos; Eaker; Travis McGee

Hey guys,
maybe we'll get good cheap night sights now.


52 posted on 07/14/2005 11:04:25 AM PDT by TEXASPROUD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Physicist
"The two key signatures for a fusion reaction are emission of neutrons in the range of 2.5 MeV and production of tritium, both of which were seen in these experiments," Xu said.

I didn't see any mention of when the lithium was added to breed the tritium. Is there some other process for breeding tritium that doesn't require lithium?

56 posted on 07/14/2005 7:28:13 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson