Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/13/2005 6:55:05 PM PDT by oldfarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: oldfarmer
I find myself agreeing with Ben Jones. Hollywood shouldn't mess with a classic!

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
2 posted on 07/13/2005 6:58:18 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer
"corn-pone" {sm}corn-pone, n. * depreciative. A person who or thing which exhibits characteristics (stereotypically) associated with the rural southern United States. Chiefly attrib. (OED)
3 posted on 07/13/2005 6:58:32 PM PDT by oldfarmer (Mark 16:17-18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer
First Question: Why did they make this movie?

I saw an ad on a bus for the movie and I saw Luke wearing a Led Zeppelin shirt. I said to myself something is very wrong here. Since when do the good ol' Duke boys like Led Zeppelin?

4 posted on 07/13/2005 7:00:36 PM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer
In on of the very early episodes, Sheriff Rosco P. Coletrane shoots and (if memory serves me correctly) kills a man. It wasn't until after the writers realized there was a large number of children watching the program that the Dukes of Hazzard became a "Family Friendly" program with A-Team style violence.

While "Cooter" is right that an icon shouldn't be remade into something vulgar, it wasn't the initial intent of the writers to make "Dukes" a wholesome romp through the backwoods.
8 posted on 07/13/2005 7:08:04 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Join islam, see the world. Blow up unrepentant infidels. Uncle Bin Laden wants you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer

Sounds like sour grapes that he didn't get a cameo.


10 posted on 07/13/2005 7:15:11 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer

Calling Dukes of Hazard a 'classic family show' is a bit of a stretch, but I agree with the old cooter. Hollywood did the same thing with the Cat in the Hat. Made an insipid innuendo filled piece of drek.


12 posted on 07/13/2005 7:16:06 PM PDT by QueenBee3 ("Phone's ringin dude.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer

Saw the previews - no way. Classic Dukes should have been left alone.


31 posted on 07/13/2005 7:45:00 PM PDT by Scarchin (www.classdismissedblog.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer

Now this really aggravates me. My grandson is just now getting into the old show on DVD and will surely want to see the movie. Sounds like he won't be able to.


33 posted on 07/13/2005 7:57:09 PM PDT by sweetliberty (Never argue with a fool. People might not know the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer

How dare they suly the modest reputation Daisy Duke mainteined in the series, she looked like a nun!


35 posted on 07/13/2005 8:00:36 PM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer
Cooter.”

Newt Gingrich: “Weird left-wing actor.”

40 posted on 07/13/2005 8:29:37 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer; goldstategop; frogjerk; SunStar; Hazzardgate; 54skylark

I'm curious as to whether or not the Confederate flag was removed from the top of the car. DOES ANYBODY KNOW? I'll be extremely P.O.'d if it has been, & I need to know before I go see the movie.


41 posted on 07/13/2005 8:52:42 PM PDT by libertyman (It's time to make marijuana legal AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Twenty-first century Hollywood formula:

Take a classic movie or TV show.

Skim off the surface.

Discard remaining substance.

Add sexual content, drug humor, profanity, gross stereotypes, political correctness.

Insert Flavor of the Month Kutcher clone, a respected actor, a scantily-clad "it" girl, complete with fake breasts, collagen lips, cheek implants, liposuction and Botox where needed. Garnish with a gratuitous cameo or seven.

Add CGI where needed to shore up deficiencies in the plot.

Market the hell out of it. Build up hopes unrealistically high with previews.

Charge $7 a butt, more on the coasts.

After 6-12 months an a successful international run, release the "director's cut" two disc DVD, complete with cookie-cutter interviews, moronic outtakes and up to four "alternate endings."

Laugh all the way to the bank, knowing talentless directors and scriptwriters with no new ideas can invest in hack actors and defraud the movie-going public.

Oh, and everyone involved in this Dukes movie should be horsewhipped for defiling a classic as they have done. I mean, Sean William Scott? What were they thinking?

46 posted on 07/13/2005 9:36:21 PM PDT by jayhorn (when i hit the drum, you shake the booty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer
I just saw an ad for the movie, an also think it will be a stinker.

Actually, I didn't like the TV series all that well but I guess well enough that we watched it.

They have a Black guy playing Boss Hogg. I wonder if his name will still be Jefferson Davis Hogg?

I still remember being in one of the largest Black neighborhoods in Portsmouth, VA and seeing not one, but two different kids with confederate flags on their trikes. I then remembered, they were Dukes of Hazzard, toys.

48 posted on 07/14/2005 6:07:02 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer
Well, I watched the "These Boots Are Made For Walking"

So I don't have to see the film...

53 posted on 07/14/2005 6:34:49 AM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer

You know, I saw the trailer and, while the movie looks dumb, I noticed Lynda Carter in a role. She still looks beautiful!


55 posted on 07/14/2005 6:38:39 AM PDT by Puddleglum (Thank God the Boston blowhard lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer
constant sexual innuendo and some very clear sexual situations

All the more reason to see it!
59 posted on 07/14/2005 6:49:02 AM PDT by kx9088
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer

Next month?

I thought this movie had come and bombed already.

Hollyweird could not have made anything modern southern to save their lives.


61 posted on 07/14/2005 6:56:27 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldfarmer
Did not the "old" General Lee have the Confederate flag on the hood?

I saw a clip of the new movie and I did not see one... I guess political correctness strikes again.

I agree with another poster on this thread - why was this movie made? The producers should have just had the car on for 90 minutes and let Jessica Simpson prance and slither around a-la Tawny Kittaen (spelling?).

That's my soapbox rant - please drive through.

77 posted on 07/14/2005 8:42:55 PM PDT by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Click the pic.
81 posted on 07/24/2005 8:59:58 AM PDT by solitas (So what if I support an OS that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.4.2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson