To: Quick1
If she wasn't a covert agent, then why was the White House initially outraged at the incident?The White House was NOT originally "outraged" at the incident.
They were outraged that Wilson lied in his op-ed piece (now proven by the Senate Intelligence Commmitte report) and Rove was trying to tell Cooper not to trust Wilson.
Honestly, it sounded to me like Rove might have been trying to tell a friend not to make a fool out of himself.
And look how Cooper has repaid him.
113 posted on
07/13/2005 5:52:36 PM PDT by
Howlin
(Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
To: Howlin
No good deed ever goes unpunished.
You'd think the Administration might have learned that one by now, eh?
117 posted on
07/13/2005 5:59:48 PM PDT by
CFC__VRWC
("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
To: Howlin
They were outraged that Wilson lied in his op-ed piece (now proven by the Senate Intelligence Commmitte report)
Page 52 of the report: "Ambassador Wilson reached the same conclusion that the Embassy has reached that it was highly unlikely that anything between Iraq and Niger was going on." -US Ambassador to Niger
118 posted on
07/13/2005 5:59:48 PM PDT by
Quick1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson