Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Depot workers protest tough bargaining rules (pay for performance for govt. workers)
The Times-Tribune (Scranton PA) ^ | 7/13/2005 | Rafael Cores

Posted on 07/13/2005 11:31:58 AM PDT by Born Conservative

WASHINGTON — The route between the Tobyhanna Army Depot and the nation’s capital is getting quite a workout.

On Tuesday, 48 union workers at Tobyhanna arrived by bus on Capitol Hill to protest forthcoming personnel reforms at the departments of Defense and Homeland Security.

Five days earlier, a group of workers from the depot came to support the state’s congressional delegation urging the Base Realignment and Closure Commission to spare Pennsylvania’s military facilities.

Tuesday’s rally brought about 500 federal workers from 16 states to protest the plan that limits the ability of workers to bargain collectively.

“They want to make us K-Mart workers,” said Keith Hill, the president of Tobyhanna’s section of the American Federation of Government Employees.

Implementation of the National Security Personnel System, covering workers at the Defense Department, is scheduled to begin in late summer or early fall, said spokeswoman Joyce Frank. Similar regulations will cover the Department of Homeland Security.

House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland criticized the new measures and said the Bush administration wants to extend them to other federal agencies — a “pay-for-performance system.”

Ms. Frank said that “extensive training will be given to supervisors and managers” whose pay will depend on how well they perform their duties.

The union accused the administration of seeking to end the Civil Service and the GS pay-scale systems, to curtail the role of unions, and to give supervisors wide latitude over personnel decisions.

Tobyhanna Army Depot has 4,300 full-time workers.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: tobyhanna

1 posted on 07/13/2005 11:31:59 AM PDT by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
The union accused the administration of seeking to end the Civil Service and the GS pay-scale systems, to curtail the role of unions, and to give supervisors wide latitude over personnel decisions.

And this is bad how?
2 posted on 07/13/2005 11:44:17 AM PDT by babyface00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
They want to make us K-Mart workers

Better than sounding like a French unionist

3 posted on 07/13/2005 11:44:29 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Toby has how many workers? 4,300? Doing what?

That has been the whole problem for that base. Once someone gets in there to work, they are on the dole. Government payroll and bennies, and they never have to answer to a performance review. Now that they would be held accountable for the work they do, they panic.
4 posted on 07/13/2005 11:44:54 AM PDT by WakeUpAndVote (Member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy since 1992!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpAndVote

On the dole AND beholden to Paul Kanjorski.


5 posted on 07/13/2005 11:49:25 AM PDT by Born Conservative ("If not us, who? And if not now, when? - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: babyface00
And this is bad how?

Where and what are the checks and balances? Favoritism is already rampant in the Civil Service...this new plan just makes it easier for the GOB system....

6 posted on 07/13/2005 12:06:13 PM PDT by Getsmart64 (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: babyface00
Ignores the 'from each according to ability. to each according to need' mantra.

Mantra omission is a capital sin.

7 posted on 07/13/2005 12:06:56 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Getsmart64
The new system sounds suspiciously like the private sector.

Seems to work OK there.
8 posted on 07/13/2005 1:10:18 PM PDT by babyface00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: babyface00
The new system sounds suspiciously like the private sector. Seems to work OK there

Ok...so by your logic...civil service employees should start receiving the same pay as the equivalent private market employee....fat chance that will happen.....Civil Service pay compared to the equivalent of private sector is 60-70%....civil servants take a cut in pay for security...but even that doesn't work out with the current and past BRACs...so write your congressman for higher wages for civil service employees...comparable to private sector..and then you can treat civil service employees like private sector employees...

9 posted on 07/13/2005 1:56:20 PM PDT by Getsmart64 (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Getsmart64
Civil Service pay compared to the equivalent of private sector is 60-70%....civil servants take a cut in pay for security

Even if true, its irrelevant. Security and performance are two separate issues. Unless you believe that the pay discrepancy is license for civil servants to coast on the taxpayer dole for their multi-year working careers...
10 posted on 07/14/2005 7:19:45 AM PDT by babyface00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson