I see they used the old "you don't need an assault weapon for hunting" line when they passed the stupid ban.
I haven't hunted for years. I suppose all that time I spent being cold and wet in the woods while I was in the army cooled my ardor for hunting. I do, however, collect historic military firearms. Most of my collection would no doubt fall into the "assault weapon" category as defined by the city council of Columbus. Does this ban mean that anyone who has a collection of historic military firearms in Columbus is now a criminal?
I would venture to guess that this ban violates the Second Amendment rights of a number of residents of Columbus. Seems like a good lawyer could take the city to court and get the ban overturned.
IT'S NOT ABOUT GUNS, IT'S ABOUT FREEDOM!