Does anybody else find it interesting that the NY Slimes would allow Miller to go to jail rather than reveal her source, even though she has said that her source has released her from anonymity and told her she can testify?
And her reason for not doing so: She says the source was coerced into releasing her.
In my opinion her source cannot be Karl Rove for a couple reasons:
1. I cannot see the administration coercing Rove into releasing Miller from her pledge of anonymity (assuming the claim of coercion is true).
2. If the source was indeed Rove, would not the NY Slimes and Miller want that news out immediately to pile on?
No, something does not smell right here with Miller's source. Why would the NY Slimes have her go to jail, rather than testify even AFTER her source told her she could?
The only thing I can think of is the source would make liberals look very bad, or the Slimes look bad (or both), or it would exonerate Rove.
Besides the fact that this is a complete non-story and Rove broke no laws, something is just not right with the Slimes forcing a reporter to go to jail when it was not necessary.
Somehow......the NYT is involved. Would be as big, or bigger story that Rathergate.
Miller would be "squealing like a stuck pig" (added that for Danny Boy) if it were Rove.
I just hope they don't get away with this crap. I can't stand what the MSM and the Screaming Dimmies are trying to do to this country.