Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems Leak Bush's Court Short List
NewsMax ^

Posted on 07/12/2005 2:07:09 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-283 next last
To: F16Fighter

Oh but, Nellie fits the D&Ger's perfectly.


121 posted on 07/12/2005 2:51:42 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke

Jones bump!


122 posted on 07/12/2005 2:52:07 PM PDT by Howlin (Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph
You cannot have the Mango!


123 posted on 07/12/2005 2:52:16 PM PDT by retrokitten (www.retrosrants.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify

That's true, this could all be Dem hype. However, I have heard a lot about this, and Bush is definitely being extremely accomodating to them - something that has gotten him (and us) absolutely NOTHING in the past, and has simply encouraged them because they smell weakness.


124 posted on 07/12/2005 2:52:44 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Absolutely. We don't call them The Malcontents and The Unappeasables for nothing.


125 posted on 07/12/2005 2:53:07 PM PDT by Howlin (Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

He's mine, all mine, I won't share.


126 posted on 07/12/2005 2:53:29 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: mware

Thompson's a good guy.

For a Supreme Court justice ... maybe a bit too much on the moderate side for my taste.


127 posted on 07/12/2005 2:53:51 PM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: WoodstockCat

True. He may surprise us - this may have been simply for appearance's sake - but the way the Dems are crowing over it makes me very concerned.


128 posted on 07/12/2005 2:54:04 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: livius

Well, I hate that it turned into this....sorry, I attract them....:) anyway, we will all find out in due time who the nominee is.....I still have faith that the base of Republican Party will be very happy with Pres. Bush's nominee.

Don't let people who never get off their computers to actually go and work for the Republicans, ya know, go door-to-door, etc....tell you how to think or what to post.


129 posted on 07/12/2005 2:54:43 PM PDT by yellowdoghunter (Liberals should be seen and not heard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
F. Lee Levin for the Supreme Court!

Mark Levin is the main man!

130 posted on 07/12/2005 2:55:25 PM PDT by beyond the sea (No more legitimate hearing room ever again, Conyers......... to the broom closet ! ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

That freak has it all wrong. You aren't obsessive....you're compulsive. Everyone with half a brain knows that. Of course, that doesn't include me because I require full-brain usage at all times. Sigh...it seems we blondes have to work harder at everything.....


131 posted on 07/12/2005 2:55:54 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002

Heh-Heh Laura said she gave it till noon before the names were leaked. Of course Bush knew that would be the case like everybody else who knows how these effeminate ninnies operate, so whoever he's going to nominate, I'm guessing it's not those names.


132 posted on 07/12/2005 2:56:45 PM PDT by johnb838 (Dominus Vobiscum.... Et cum spiritu tuo... Oremus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Here we go again -- Dems are giving us two names they say are on the list and complaints have already started on the thread -- why would anyone take the Dems comments as fact or get upset before the nomination? You all are wasting your time to get so upset without having facts.

Why surprised?

It's not like there hasn't been a continued pattern of liberal behavior and actions within the GOP/Congress and the White House regarding spending, the deficit, trade policies, the borders, and many say, even conducting the war in Iraq.

133 posted on 07/12/2005 2:57:06 PM PDT by Black Tooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

Mark Levin would be good.

:)


134 posted on 07/12/2005 2:57:13 PM PDT by yellowdoghunter (Liberals should be seen and not heard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

You know what they say about assumptions.....


Yeah. I ASSUMED Bush was a good man, who supported the constitution when I VOTED for him. Oh yes, I know where assuming gets you!


135 posted on 07/12/2005 2:57:13 PM PDT by Iron Matron (Illegals should be Caught and Deported; not Released and Supported!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic

I thought so too until I checked his record in the Senate. You may be right though. 12 years are not very long to base a life time job on.


136 posted on 07/12/2005 2:57:14 PM PDT by mware ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche........ "Nope, you are"-- GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic
Punch here
137 posted on 07/12/2005 2:57:17 PM PDT by Howlin (Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

You may be right. Here's hoping. I am just sick of this "bipartisan" stuff, because all it really means is that the Republicans give in (when they don't have to) and the Dems walk all over us (when they have no right to do so). I'll try to maintain a positive attitude until I hear a name - after which point I have every right to shriek and scream!

That said, his other appointees have been very good, although the Dems and the RINOs have been fighting him every step of the way.


138 posted on 07/12/2005 2:57:38 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

That's the thing that bothers me - this "bipartisan" nonsense, which only seems to mean us giving in and them gloating.


139 posted on 07/12/2005 2:58:27 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

LOL! What a riot!


140 posted on 07/12/2005 2:59:36 PM PDT by rabidralph (Stop surveilling--start arresting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-283 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson