Posted on 07/11/2005 5:13:46 AM PDT by harpu
-snip-
That said, the disclosure that Mr. Bush's top political strategist discussed the CIA employment of Mr. Wilson's wife amounts to a political embarrassment for Mr. Rove and the White House. A presidential spokesman had previously given what appeared to be an unequivocal public assurance that Mr. Rove hadn't been involved in the disclosure of Ms. Plame as a CIA operative. Discovery that earlier denials may have been carefully parsed would represent another blow to the administration's credibility, compounding damage from the underlying issue that initially brought Mr. Wilson into the spotlight.
Mr. Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, last week denied that Mr. Rove had contacted Mr. Cooper last Wednesday, and said that when Mr. Rove spoke to Mr. Cooper two years ago, "Karl didn't disclose Valerie Plame's identification to anyone. That's not a technical statement. That's as practical and direct as I can make it." He also told The Wall Street Journal that Mr. Rove had never asked any reporter to treat him as a confidential source in the matter, "so if Matt Cooper is going to jail to protect a source, it's not Karl he's protecting."
Yesterday, Mr. Luskin explained that Mr. Rove, like other White House officials, had signed a document provided by Mr. Fitzgerald in December 2003, allowing reporters to testify about conversations with him. On Wednesday, before Mr. Cooper was headed to court and a possible jail term, his attorney, Richard Sauber, called Mr. Luskin and asked for reassurance that the earlier waiver encompassed Mr. Rove's discussions with Mr. Cooper. If so, Mr. Sauber sought more express consent. Mr. Luskin checked with Mr. Fitzgerald as to whether more specific consent was necessary, and then gave that consent to Mr. Cooper, who said last week that he received the permission in "somewhat dramatic fashion."
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
E.J. Dionne jumped on her for mentioning it also
BTW ... is there a copy of this email so that we can see it?
I've only seen the clips from the online version of Isikoff's article. I don't know if the whole email has been reproduced elsewhere. I'd like to see that, too.
Gregory flat out asked Scott if he thinks Rove commented a crime ..
Scott's response was that he wasn't going to respond to an on going investigation .. that was when Moran jumped in
By the look on Scott's face was TICKED OFF
IMO .. the media is trying to turn this around .. this is a set up
I'll have to watch the replay at 11:00
WOW...great post.....welcome to FR
Not.
This is getting downright hilarious.
IMHO the special prosecutor will be asking the Grand Jury to indict the Handsome and dashing Joe Wilson and his lovely Wife Val, as well as Val's ex Boss
The one thing about this whole saga that has laways caused me to refer to Joe Wilson as a FRAUD is the simple little fact that when Joe Wilson went to Niger, the Itilian Document was not in the picture. Yet Wilson cites the document as part of the reason he went to Niger
i think it was ann coulter who said that
it was common knowledge in washington d.c. that
plame drove her car to the cia. so, apparently she worked there.
After watching what the Press did to Scott McClelland today and then Harry Reid's comments
I can't wait to see that
Ithink you are spot on; this whole investigation is beyond the Plame game and into the forgeries.
Because they have to get the London bombings off the front pages before the American people remember there's a terrorist threat.
If you are the target of the SP/GJ does he have to inform you and your lawyer?..
Everybody in town knew she worked for the CIA. How is that "leaking"?
1) HOW did the forged document end up being used as reference material in Colin Powell's written statement to the U.N.?
2)And who was behind this obvious sabotage?
For the above reasons is why Jack Straw said he could not share their Intelligence with the United States. That's because it was obvious that there was a MOLE in our State Department and/or CIA. THESE ARE SERIOUS CHARGES and the cry for Rove's head is almost laughable to me
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.