Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: Carl/NewsMax
2 posted on
07/09/2005 9:03:32 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
To: Carl/NewsMax
4 posted on
07/09/2005 9:04:57 AM PDT by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: Carl/NewsMax; Mia T
It's not like any FALN terrorists pose a threat to NY commuters. </sarc>
5 posted on
07/09/2005 9:05:42 AM PDT by
jla
To: Carl/NewsMax
Hildabeast FOAD you POS!
Using tradgedy to bash the POTUS such a class act from this clown!
To: Carl/NewsMax
8 posted on
07/09/2005 9:07:43 AM PDT by
Babu
To: Carl/NewsMax
2008 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton Says who?
9 posted on
07/09/2005 9:08:07 AM PDT by
11Bush
(No outstanding felonies, but my life has been one long misdemeanor.)
To: Carl/NewsMax
Rush had a response to this attack yesterday. Seems New York has not spent a substantial chunk ($50M+) of funds already allocated by Homeland Security. As usual, Hillary's attacks are based on distortions, half-truths and libspeak.
To: Carl/NewsMax
"Pant Suit Poisining" ...it afflicts many poor souls
13 posted on
07/09/2005 9:09:28 AM PDT by
woofie
(Neocon spelled backward is Nocoen)
To: Carl/NewsMax
Why would we need protection from the religion of peace? Is Hillary saying that New Yorkers have something to fear from militant islamic representatives of the religion of peace?
14 posted on
07/09/2005 9:09:35 AM PDT by
kharaku
(G3 (http://www.cobolsoundsystem.com/mp3s/unreleased/evewasanape.mp3))
To: Carl/NewsMax
I was flipping through channels last night and I saw a New York head of security or some such thing being asked about Clinton's remarks...whether they had been given enough. The guy said they had been given already over a billion dollars...or some unbelieveable amount.
She's the senator from New York..if they haven't gotten enough (and my guess is they have been)..why isn't it HER fault..
She's disgusting
To: Carl/NewsMax
We are woefully behind where London and other subway systems are because London does have the video surveillanceWhich was of absolutely no help in preventing the attacks, but may be useful in figuring out who and how.
If you think it is important to spend billions of dollars to perhaps have a better chance of catching people after they commit an atrocity, then you might agree with Hill.
16 posted on
07/09/2005 9:12:48 AM PDT by
Restorer
(Liberalism: the auto-immune disease of societies.)
To: Carl/NewsMax
Nothing has happened, but if it does, it will be...
say it with me, everyone...
BUSH'S FAULLLLLLLLLLLLLLLT!
*growl*
17 posted on
07/09/2005 9:13:06 AM PDT by
Blue Champagne
(Quomodo cogis comas tuas sic videri?)
To: Carl/NewsMax
I am outraged that Her husband released known terrorists who tried to assassinate the president of the USA.
To hell with her outrage.
18 posted on
07/09/2005 9:13:14 AM PDT by
dts32041
( Dear Senator Durbin, I am not an Illinois Nazi. (US ARMY RET))
To: Carl/NewsMax
"We are woefully behind where London and other subway systems are because London does have the video surveillance,"... And look at all the good the video surveillace did there! It may eventually help them identify the perps, but did nothing to prevent the attack.
19 posted on
07/09/2005 9:13:40 AM PDT by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?")
To: Carl/NewsMax
Democrat motto: Never miss an opportunity to say "It's Bush's fault"...even when there is nothing to blame on him.
21 posted on
07/09/2005 9:18:57 AM PDT by
Optimist
(I think I'm beginning to see a pattern here.)
To: Carl/NewsMax
Funny - three studies came out in the last month that basically says 'video surveillance' does NOTHING to stop attacks. Even in London, among the most watched cities in the world, you cannot stop these small attacks.
But then again, the Democrats never bother with logic, the truth or the Constitution.
22 posted on
07/09/2005 9:19:20 AM PDT by
txzman
(Jer 23:29)
To: Carl/NewsMax; Jim Noble
Does Hillary really mean the richest city in the US can't afford to pay for its own transit security?
23 posted on
07/09/2005 9:20:46 AM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: Carl/NewsMax
So, why hasn't the city of New York paid for their security? Why do I, living out here in Arizona where we have our own problems, have to pay for security cameras in New York City?
To: Carl/NewsMax
Hilldabeast is already grandstanding for election 2008.
To: Carl/NewsMax
Sounds like she's running in '08.
27 posted on
07/09/2005 9:23:06 AM PDT by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson