Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: livius

And, it was simply not fair that only one spouse - Michael S - could file for divorce, while the other spouse, Terri S, in her condition, did not have the same legal right. What kind of contract is that when only one party can break it?


7 posted on 07/08/2005 3:13:56 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: summer

If I went into a coma, I would not want my parent to have the right to get me a divorce.

In my religion, only adultery is an accepted excuse for divorce, not murder.

It's till death do we part, even if my husband kills me.


18 posted on 07/08/2005 3:32:27 PM PDT by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: summer

The whole thing was wrong and corrupt from the start. I think this is the point Jeb is trying to make. Of course, since the entire liberal press corps combined with the loony libertarians on the talk radio circuit are against him, I don't think he has much chance of getting the message out.


19 posted on 07/08/2005 3:32:45 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: summer

not have the same legal right

True. And then add the insult - he was her guardian.
She had every right to file for divorce and even get an annulment since he, openly, was an adulterer. That's the reason greer kept him as guardian.


267 posted on 07/11/2005 4:10:38 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson