Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hi Ho, Hi Ho, It's Off to Jail I Go
Special to FreeRepublic ^ | 15 July 2005 | John Armor (Congressman Billybob)

Posted on 07/08/2005 10:41:29 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob

Edited on 07/08/2005 12:00:09 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Congressman Billybob

Small correction: it was Niger, not Nigeria. Thought you'd like to know.


21 posted on 07/08/2005 12:15:18 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

"It covered post partum psychiatric problems she’d had,"

Would venture to speculate that the CIA didn't want Plame acknowledge that she was crazy so the CIA got her off the public payroll fast.


22 posted on 07/08/2005 12:25:18 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Yours is the fourth set of sharp FreeRepublic eyes that caught that correction. Thanks. Already sent the correction to my publishers, both ink and electrons.

John / Billybob
23 posted on 07/08/2005 12:49:39 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush appoint a Justice who obeys the Constitution? I give 65-35 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Was Gerald Fitzpatrick there too?


24 posted on 07/08/2005 12:52:57 PM PDT by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Methinks somebody's grandstanding.

And Methinks Ms. Miller has an invisible friend.

25 posted on 07/08/2005 1:09:01 PM PDT by dinasour (Pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dinasour

You think she's her own source?


26 posted on 07/08/2005 1:17:40 PM PDT by AmishDude (Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
You think she's her own source?

I think she made up the fact that she had a source.

Now she can't name it, because if it differs from what Novak and the other reporter say, she is up the river on a perjury charge.

There is no way a reporter for the New York Times would go to jail to protect someone in the Bush Administration, especially when his name is going to come out anyway, and he has reportedly already released them from confidentiality.

27 posted on 07/08/2005 1:27:59 PM PDT by dinasour (Pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Well done, counsellor...


28 posted on 07/08/2005 2:45:46 PM PDT by eureka! (It will not be safe to vote Democrat for a long, long, time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Whoa! Miller's source released her from confidentiality, too, and she still won't tell?

Depends which source for which story. If her Plame source released her, I think she would tell that; but if they want to know the source who tipped her off about an impending raid on a phony Islamonazi "charity", maybe THAT source is afraid he/she'll be exposed as trying to damage our national security...

29 posted on 07/09/2005 5:42:36 AM PDT by Sal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Great article, once again.


30 posted on 07/09/2005 9:20:40 AM PDT by Jackknife (No man is entitled to the blessings of freedom unless he be vigilant in its preservation.-MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Where is this same investigation regarding the fake Bush National Guard memo that was a forgery, with intent to manipulate the most important US election?

Why are news people not being forced to reveal sources here?

Selective enforcement.


31 posted on 07/09/2005 7:00:06 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Apparently, the sources who’d talked to both these reporters on the subject of Ms. Plame had signed waivers allowing the reporters to speak.
So when does Joe Sixpack get to see the names of these sources? I haven't seen anything yet about who these sources are. If they waived their "protection" then why can't their names be released to the public?
It would be interesting to see whether or not they are Clinton holdovers or just entrenched bureaucrats!
32 posted on 07/10/2005 3:55:00 AM PDT by philman_36 ("It’s a legal document, and legal documents do not change." Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf

No one is being prosecuted for publishing secrets. The 1st Amendment prevents that.

But the 1st gives the press no right to engage in criminal activies, such as conspiracy or theft, to get a story. To carry this to its (il)logical conclusion, a journalist cannot commit murder with impunity to get a story.


33 posted on 07/10/2005 4:12:49 AM PDT by Restorer (Liberalism: the auto-immune disease of societies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Brilliant.


34 posted on 07/11/2005 7:21:39 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
I trust that you have read Cliff Kincaid's column in Accuracy in Media, "Why Judith Miller Should Stay in Jail", in which he posits that perhaps she, who did NOT write a column about Plame, is herself the leak to other reporters. The NYT's rank hypocrisy in first advocating an independent prosecutor and now stonewalling the investigation is also a part of his column.
35 posted on 07/12/2005 1:50:34 AM PDT by Carolinamom (NC motto: to be rather than to seem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom; Congressman Billybob

Bump carolina, billybob, she beat me to it...this is a good article. Poses the notion--"Maybe there's no source in this sourcepan."


36 posted on 07/12/2005 1:32:52 PM PDT by Mamzelle (rot, Judy, rot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dinasour; Congressman Billybob

I like your entire line of reasoning, dina.

Great column, Congressman!(apart from the geography blooper...:0#) lol!


37 posted on 07/14/2005 9:11:11 AM PDT by headsonpikes ("The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson