Skip to comments.
G-8 leaders pledge $3 billion aid for Palestinians
Jerusalem Post ^
| July 8, 2005
Posted on 07/08/2005 9:19:19 AM PDT by Alouette
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 last
To: Alouette
The same jihad mindset methodically murders innocent London commuters, then receives monetary awards(?)
In the historical sense, as well as today, it's termed blatant appeasement, which means other western cities will be attacked by the Islamic blackmailers.
61
posted on
07/08/2005 3:17:06 PM PDT
by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is never free)
To: Alouette
" The British leader said the assistance was designed "so that two states, Israel and Palestine, two peoples and two religions can live side by side in peace." Read your Bible leaders.......taint gunna happen!!!!!!!
62
posted on
07/08/2005 3:21:38 PM PDT
by
pollywog
(Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
To: Zavien Doombringer
even after a terrorist attack, they send money to fund more terrorists... Go figure... Of course. It seems to have worked really well in the past...
(Jeeeeezzzzzz!)
63
posted on
07/08/2005 6:54:50 PM PDT
by
lancer
(If you are not with us, you are against us!)
To: pollywog
well happen smy bible says when land for peace happens jesus return soon.gramps was right.
To: Alouette
President Bush had refused to be bound by the 0.7% target. The United States is currently giving 0.16% of national income, the smallest percentage of any of the G-8 countries.Giving 0.16% of our national income unconditionally is 0.16% too much.
And who cares how the G-8 wastes their taxpayers money?
To: Alouette
I would have given ZERO to anybody this year.
To give money today only invites blackmail.
66
posted on
07/08/2005 9:01:51 PM PDT
by
Tax Government
(Put down the judicial insurrection. Contribute to FR.)
To: Alouette
How many suicide vests does $3 billion buy?
67
posted on
07/08/2005 9:03:02 PM PDT
by
Melas
(Lives in state of disbelief)
To: af_vet_rr
Please tell me you are not really that delusional?!?!?!?!?
68
posted on
07/09/2005 7:00:03 AM PDT
by
logic
("All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing......")
To: F16Fighter
"Giving 0.16% of our national income unconditionally is 0.16% too much."
Besides, where in the constitution does it say that the government can give money to other countries in the first place. It our government wasn't so busy giving billions upon billions away to other countries, we could be at at a 10% instead of 25-30% federal tax rate, what do you think that would do to the economy?
69
posted on
07/09/2005 7:06:22 AM PDT
by
logic
("All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing......")
To: Alouette
That's only fair...keep giving brutal dictators tax payers
money..at the expense of the tax payers own families...
70
posted on
07/11/2005 6:06:52 AM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Does the Red Crescent have falafel dollies?)
To: pollywog
Nope but the NWO-3rd Wayers Apostate Church believes that 'their god' can make it happen..
He shall send them strong delusion that they would believe a lie...
71
posted on
07/11/2005 6:10:05 AM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Does the Red Crescent have falafel dollies?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson