Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Letter to a useless Senator
The San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 7/7/2005 | ca-dreamer

Posted on 07/07/2005 5:35:41 PM PDT by ca-dreamer74

Boxer criticizes Iraq war in SF speech 'Our troops deserve more,' senator says Bay City News Wednesday, July 6, 2005 * Printable Version * Email This Article Sen. Barbara Boxer offered a major foreign policy speech on the war in Iraq before hundreds of her constituents in San Francisco today. The situation in Iraq is spiraling out of control, she said, and the pool of people willing to fight in the insurgency against American troop presence there seems bottomless. She described herself as "distressed, angry and frustrated'' over the continuing unrest in Iraq and the mounting death toll with no apparent end in sight.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; US: California; War on Terror; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 109th; boxer; senatorboxer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Dear Senator Boxer,

I recall with great clarity the beginning of your Senate career, dodging the House check-writing scandal to become a successful Senate candidate for California. I remember your commercials, how you promised California that you would get Japan and Germany to pay us for their defense. I remember laughing at it. How preposterous, that you would turn America into the great protection racketeer of the world. Nevertheless, you continue to confound me with your latest foreign policy blunders regarding Iraq, and I write you now to entreat you to shut up. I read your speech to the commonwealth club and your remarks in the San Francisco Chronicle. In your own words you continue to wring your hands regarding the war in Iraq: the loss of lives, the loss of the 'propaganda war', the failure to get Osama Bin Laden and the lack of a timetable.

First, I recognize that you are merely a politician; your words are carefully measured to impact the audience in a way so as to appeal to their own beliefs and ensure they donate a bunch of money to your campaign 'war chest.' I realize that you are a naïf when it comes to successful foreign policy, especially since there hasn't been much of it since the end of World War II. However, I think you should ask an aid to read you the casualty statistics for the wars America has been involved in. While you might be "distressed, angry and frustrated" over the mounting toll the war in Iraq has taken on our soldiers, our losses in Iraq are insignificant in comparison to those lost in previous conflicts. What are 2,000 dead in comparison to our losses in World War II? In comparison to Vietnam?

You have also bemoaned the loss of the 'propaganda war' in this speech. Have you looked into how we lost this supposed propaganda war? Have you noticed that your own colleagues, and indeed yourself, have provided aid and comfort to our enemies while seeking political gain? Perhaps if the ACLU was not out trying to gain privileges, normally reserved for American citizens, for enemy combatants, illegal aliens, indeed anyone save an American citizen, we could win this war on terror. Perhaps if you and the Democrats would stand behind the Commander-in-Chief and the soldiers for longer than it takes to get a photo-op, the terrorists would recognize that they were facing a strong and united America. Instead you stand up behind the surrender-now-crowd and score cheap political points with people who were going to vote for you anyway. Instead you turn your back on the nation and the soldiers who defend it to take shots at the President. You have second-guessed him, called him a liar, impugned his skills at leadership, and indeed told other nations to ignore him since he will be out of office soon, to the extent that our enemies are strengthened against us.

Finally, you derail any attempt to win the war on terror by your incessant demands as to the location of Osama Bin Laden. War isn't a complex game of Where's Waldo! Even if we captured Bin Laden, and put him on trial, and all that you hope for comes to pass, the war would go on. Al Qaeda isn't a World War II Germany, capture Hitler and everyone will surrender; they are a loose affiliation of religious madmen. You hope we "capture those responsible" for 9/11, the bombings in Madrid, and now the bombings in London. I don't. I hope we annihilate them. I hope we go out and kill every single terrorist and terrorist abettor out there. Simply because I know that if we captured them, the Democrats and the ACLU would ensure they were released or acquitted, so that they might get an edge in the next election. If we kill them all, then we certainly won’t have to worry about them attacking us, recruiting others, or training more terrorists to attack us. You also want a timetable for our withdrawal from Iraq. If that aide of yours is still blathering on and on about the thousands more Americans that have died in foreign conflicts than in Iraq, ask him to tell you about what happened after our timetable in Vietnam. You will learn that our enemies waited until we left, and then pounced on the poorly defended South Vietnamese and slaughtered them and as many Cambodians and Laotians as they could get their hands on. So no, a timetable is really a bad idea. Besides, shouldn’t you be asking former President Clinton for a timetable regarding our troops in Bosnia first?

In conclusion, I find that the biggest difference between you and the people you have sworn to represent is that your concern is what is best for your political future and ours is what is best for our future. Rather than try to win the war on terror, support the President, support the troops, and support legislation to keep America safer, you have chosen the terrorists. You choose more dead Americans as long as it makes the Republicans look bad. You choose political innuendo and cheap attacks over intelligent leadership and strong values. Your cheap attacks and constant badgering of the war effort is doing everything it can to lose the war in Iraq, when it has been nothing but a string of lopsided victories thus far. Your words of derision, doubt, and dishonor are doing everything they can to lose the propaganda war to Al Jazeera and a man hiding in a cave. Your constant cries of 'Where's Osama' do nothing but strengthen the resolve of the terrorists and make us seem weak in the eyes of the world. Thus I beg and plead, badger about health care all you want, decry the lack of education for illegal aliens, demand more liberals on the Supreme Court, indeed, push all the liberal/socialist legislation through Congress that you can, just stop talking about foreign policy. Unless you someday want your service to America honored in an al Qaeda museum, a la John Kerry in Vietnam, leave the war on terror to the people who want to win it.

1 posted on 07/07/2005 5:35:41 PM PDT by ca-dreamer74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74

Partner, that's a first class ass chewin!

Semper Fi.


2 posted on 07/07/2005 5:40:44 PM PDT by kas2591 (Life's harder when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74

FANTASTIC!!!


3 posted on 07/07/2005 5:41:25 PM PDT by rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74

Good job. Won't change any one of the few brain cells Boxcutter has.


4 posted on 07/07/2005 5:42:23 PM PDT by dynachrome ("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kas2591

It does leave a bad taste in the mouth of the person chewing her out.


5 posted on 07/07/2005 5:43:58 PM PDT by handy old one (It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74
....you have sworn to represent...

Incredibly well worded letter.

Whether she reads it or not, is irrelevent. She DOES NOT represent you. Your House member represents you. She is a Senator and has a TOTALLY different function than a Representative. Had it not been for the 17th Amendment, she would have been elected by the State legistures. As it stands, she is elected as just another represantive by the uninformed masses.

6 posted on 07/07/2005 5:44:41 PM PDT by Two Thirds Vote Aye (9/11/2001: #1 cXXXton Legacy; N. Korea NUKES: #2; Red China Nukes Target U.S.: #3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rose
The pool of people willing to fight in the insurgency against American troop presence there seems bottomless.

And that's just the liberal Democrats in the House and the Senate...

7 posted on 07/07/2005 5:44:56 PM PDT by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74

Awesome!!Send this to Rush and Sean and urge them to read it.


8 posted on 07/07/2005 5:45:33 PM PDT by DarthVader (Always ready to educate liberals by beating them profusely about the head with a Louisville Slugger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Vlad

Ha ha ha! Too true! Too True!


9 posted on 07/07/2005 5:49:50 PM PDT by ca-dreamer74 (Known Blog-Pimp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74

Great comments! Hope you sent 'em to Babs!

I am a proud Californian (a transplant, since 1988) and I detest that woman. She is such an embarrassment! Unfortunately, she'll keep getting re-elected here.


10 posted on 07/07/2005 5:49:59 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (As long as Dean's the head of the D-N-C, it just looks better for the G-O-P!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74

Great letter, too bad one of her staffers will can it.


11 posted on 07/07/2005 5:50:09 PM PDT by RightWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74

bookmk,ping,fer later & thanks


12 posted on 07/07/2005 5:51:41 PM PDT by Dad yer funny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74
Good job. Can we get it published in the SF paper?
13 posted on 07/07/2005 5:52:56 PM PDT by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74
Love it, but its too long. All you need it this:

You are not fit to hold the honorable office of United States Senator, and you are an embarrassment to your country.

Resign.
14 posted on 07/07/2005 5:53:31 PM PDT by roses of sharon (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theresawithanh

Sent on 7/7/2005 to Babs via her website. I'm not holding my breath for a response...


15 posted on 07/07/2005 5:54:30 PM PDT by ca-dreamer74 (Known Blog-Pimp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74

Send this to the editor of the Chronicle. Let's see if Mr. Ex-Sharon Stone will print it.


16 posted on 07/07/2005 5:55:05 PM PDT by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74
That's such a good letter that, if Boxer ever read it, even Her Denseness might concede that you have a point.

More likely you've served to convert one of her staffers, though.

Superb letter.

17 posted on 07/07/2005 5:55:13 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74
So no, a timetable is really a bad idea. Besides, shouldn’t you be asking former President Clinton for a timetable regarding our troops in Bosnia first?

Yeah, throw the fact we are still in Bosnia in their face and they usually shut up. It's as good as telling them you would agree with their stance on abortion if their mother had of gotten one.

18 posted on 07/07/2005 5:56:03 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Today I'm British (Okay, technically my ancestors are from there so I've always been)!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74
I write you now to entreat you to shut up.

A classic line. If only she would. This woman doesn't even have half a brain, I swear to God.

19 posted on 07/07/2005 5:59:54 PM PDT by JustaCowgirl (Dick Durbin is like a cow pie, but lacks the same level of intellect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ca-dreamer74

Your letter is outstanding.

We need to print it as a full page ad in the California papers.

This is when I wish I owned an oil well.


20 posted on 07/07/2005 6:00:23 PM PDT by exit82 (You see, I've been to the desert on a horse with no name--then I found FreeRepublic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson