Skip to comments.
Officials seeking missing M-60
Waynesville Daily Guide ^
| July 7, 2005
| Darrell Todd Maurina
Posted on 07/07/2005 3:44:36 PM PDT by holymoly
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-113 next last
To: Paul_Denton
"It's a weapon which is specifically designed for combat," Well, you could take it huntin if you want to kill and butcher at the same time.
61
posted on
07/07/2005 5:21:14 PM PDT
by
leadhead
(Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed.)
To: OSHA
62
posted on
07/07/2005 5:22:11 PM PDT
by
null and void
(You'll learn more on FR by accident, than other places by design)
To: Tennessee_Bob
I'm trying to machine a brake for it - sometimes, it goes off, and just won't stop...LOL2
63
posted on
07/07/2005 5:22:44 PM PDT
by
null and void
(You'll learn more on FR by accident, than other places by design)
To: Tennessee_Bob
Double barrels are notoriously hard to control.
64
posted on
07/07/2005 5:23:32 PM PDT
by
OSHA
(I,ll be breaf.)
To: Tennessee_Bob
65
posted on
07/07/2005 5:24:59 PM PDT
by
75thOVI
(Any ship can be a submarine...............once!)
To: patton
Good afternoon.
"No it doesn't - standard 12.8mm russian fifty cal."
I think that is 12.7mm and I've seen them with wheels even when on an AA mount.
Noisy thing isn't it. You've got to love commie guns.
Michael Frazier
66
posted on
07/07/2005 5:27:40 PM PDT
by
brazzaville
(No surrender,no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
To: Spktyr
The Marines figured out that the M249 was a pile of crap pretty quickly and "improvised" the M240G.Agreed, have you ever fired an M-249 with an M-16 magazine stuck in the side? Jams constantly. It was better belt-fed, but not much. And, who want a machinegun that fires 5.56mm?
67
posted on
07/07/2005 5:27:51 PM PDT
by
rivercat
(Welcome to California. Now go home.)
To: Paul_Denton
Whoever wrote that piece is an idiot. It is a MACHINEGUN! No, no, no! THIS is a machine gun!
< /MSM mode>
Comment #69 Removed by Moderator
To: brazzaville
I certainly loved firing them, yes. ;)
70
posted on
07/07/2005 5:29:43 PM PDT
by
patton
("Fool," said my Muse to me, "look in thy heart, and write.")
Comment #71 Removed by Moderator
To: dcam
Apparently the soft "assault packs" for the 249 aren't much better. Lots of complaints about them in the Army "lessons learned" report from Iraq.
As for the 5.56mm, well, it's a *light* machinegun. In all senses of the word. Doesn't make sense to me, but someone must want them.
Meanwhile, I think I'll listen to the Marines, who figured it out first and went to the M240G and pitched the M249s into the nearest smelter.
72
posted on
07/07/2005 5:35:51 PM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: holymoly
When stolen from a Joplin-area gun show on Sunday, June 21, the gun was broken Yep, that's a REALLY dangerous machinegun laying around.
73
posted on
07/07/2005 5:36:10 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(An elected Legislature can trample a man's rights as easy as a King can.)
To: snowsislander
You want to see bizarre sentences- go look at the full text of the proposed FEC regs.
People who write gobbledegook like that ought to be familiarized with an M-60. From about thirty yards or so.
And this from someone who has proofread trust indentures for muni bond issues without ripping my eyeballs from their sockets and running screaming from the room...
74
posted on
07/07/2005 5:36:32 PM PDT
by
George Smiley
(This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
To: Tax-chick
Darrell Todd Maurina, Press Officer [For news tips or content-related
inquiries]
Voice: (616) 674-8446 * FAX: (616) 674-8454 * E-Mail: Darrell128@AOL.com
PO Box 691, Lawrence, MI 49064-0691
75
posted on
07/07/2005 5:37:25 PM PDT
by
Tobor
To: holymoly
"It's a weapon which is specifically designed for combat," Wooten said. Well. . . duh!
"It does have the capacity for full automatic with a cyclical fire rate of 800 to 1,200 rounds per minute."
What's with this guy? Has he seen Saving Private Ryan once too often? He's talking about the rate of fire for an MG-42.
76
posted on
07/07/2005 5:40:06 PM PDT
by
Euro-American Scum
(A poverty-stricken middle class must be a disarmed middle class)
To: patton
I had a Pig do a "runaway gun" routine on me once...was firing from prone in short controlled bursts and took my finger off the trigger after going throughabout half the belt -but the pig just kept going "BANG-BANG-BANG"! I had to twist the belt to make it jam to get it to stop. ...interesting weapon but it was the only thing we had (never fired the M240 or M249...that was way after my time).
To: 11Bush
Why was it always the smallest guy in the squad that got the pig.This brings back memories. When I got to my first duty station (1st Cav. at Ft. Hood), we drove our 113's into the sticks where they were administratively "killed". Facing an 18 mile march back to camp, the squad leader asked for a volunteer to carry the M-60 back. Being full of piss and vinegar, I couldn't wait to hoss that bad boy. Needless to say, 3 hrs. later my perception of the coolness of the M-60 had changed forever.
To: Towed_Jumper
Oh, I was good with my pig. You would not believe how good.
I miss her. sniff.
11B2PLGMH, M-60 Gunner.
79
posted on
07/07/2005 5:49:03 PM PDT
by
patton
("Fool," said my Muse to me, "look in thy heart, and write.")
To: holymoly
How many people have been inspired by the title with M-60 "Patton tank" instead. Ok, that was off topic. Sorry :)
80
posted on
07/07/2005 6:12:11 PM PDT
by
Wiz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-113 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson