Since "homicide bomber" is only used by Fox News and others to refer to suicide bombings, would the term "suicidal homicide bomber" be redundant? I mean, on the one hand, "homicide bomber" already means that it was a suicide bomber, but then again, "suicidal" actually adds a great deal of meaning if you actually think about the words.
Also, where do you live that property-exclusive suicide bombings are so frequent that you must take special care to make the distinction?
It's not a problem where I live. Almost zero Muslims. There are plenty of high value infrastructure items like bridges that would cause enormous economic damage without killing a single person. I'm surprised such targets have not been hit at this point.