I just heard on Brit's show that Jane Harman of the dems said that Bush has always said that we are fighting in Iraq to keep from having to fight the terrorists here...
and she said that if that is TRUE, then why didn't that work for the Brits!!!
ANOTHER dem talking point...
Lets see: 1. We should have gone after Bin Ladin
2. Fighing in Iraq was supposed to keep this
from happening.
3. WE are training the terrorists in Iraq!
What else is next?
Yes, they hear that and what registers is, that it will guarantee not fighting them here. We know there are no guarantees, just what's right.
The Islamists are obviously trying to work up another attack on the US, but so far they haven't found the way to do it. In the meantime, they're attempting to destabilize our allies and scare away any support we might have. In addition, they have their own grudges against those countries (Britain and Spain, at present).
This week was some anniversary of the declaration dividing the territory of Palestine between the Israelis and the Arabs, for example, something we wouldn't think about, but they do. And Spain has been in their sights ever since they got driven out 500 years ago. Islam has been on the attack since its foundation. When the Christian West is strong, it gets driven back. When the Christian West is weak, it sees its opportunity and presses ahead.