And you do realize that without a moralistic backdrop to serve as the foundation on which the constitution was written it is worthless? That is self evident, right? The constitution is not capable of directly addressing all of lifes evils and usurptations of power, right? There is some higher more comprehensive all encompassing law...right? Otherwise we'd all be dancin' Between the lines...right?
Wow...kinda where we are today! It's just a blob of tissue....it's all relative to what you think....no biggie.....except for that blob of tissue with 10 fingers, 10 toes, a beating heart and functioning brain with complete human dna....to him or her it's relative too....and pretty damn personal.
Texasforever...meet the all encompassing law that should guide your morals. It's God's word.
Your lost and dancin' between the lines without it....and doomed. Don't drag your children and their's along. Christ alone is your guide.
Not when it comes to the constitution. The constitution is what we charge government officials with following. Nothing else. The constitution is VERY different from the one that was originally written with the most glaring changes coming after the civil war. The 14th amendment upon which R v W was originally argued has been a liberal playground from it's inception. However; it IS in the constitution just as the 16th amendment and all of the others and it is now a very cumbersome document with many paths to interpretation and I don't care who is reading it you will have as many interpretations as there are readers.