[VRWCmember]

Who is a member of the Supreme Court can change and I am always wary of amendments

I always hate it when we feel we need an amendment to return the constitution (as unlawfully amended by the courts) to the original meaning as stated in a previous amendment. It might be humorous though to see in the amendment process an amendment which simply reads:

Amendment 28: The plain wording of Amendment 5 means exactly what it says, i.e. "public use" means "public use" rather than "private use that has some ancillary public benefit".

[From many - one.]

Best idea on the the thread:

Repeated for emphasis...

Amendment 28: The plain wording of Amendment 5 means exactly what it says, i.e. "public use" means "public use" rather than "private use that has some ancillary public benefit".