There's something ironic about attacking someone else's intelligence when you can't compose two plain-English sentences without multiple errors. I saw another example on here a few days ago, when someone was talking about how hard it would be for the "flat-earther" state of Kansas to "attact" high quality students who could think "rationaly."
If you want to dispute something, why not try it with discussion? It beats throwing darts at someone else's intelligence and revealing your own lack of it in the process.
MM
***************
Thank you. You said it much better than I was able to.