Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/04/2005 9:59:36 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: SunkenCiv

GGG


2 posted on 07/04/2005 9:59:53 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

ping


3 posted on 07/04/2005 10:02:38 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedom44

Oops.


4 posted on 07/04/2005 10:09:08 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (NEW and IMPROVED: Now with 100% more Tyrannical Tendencies and Dictator Envy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedom44
Thank you very much for posting this. We get so wrapped up in the here and now that we can forget geological time, in which yesterday (a mere 40,000 years ago) humans were in the Americas. Fascinating.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Replace Justice O'Connor -- But Which One?"

5 posted on 07/04/2005 10:11:17 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush appoint a Justice who obeys the Constitution? I give 65-35 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedom44
“They are not very happy in North America. They are very wedded to the idea of colonisation 11,500 years ago.”

That does indeed appear to be the case. Scientists should welcome new data, but unfortunately many have emotional/financial attachments to old ideas.

6 posted on 07/04/2005 10:17:45 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

pre-clovis ping!


7 posted on 07/04/2005 10:19:11 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedom44

Six feet, eh? Kinda argues against the fact that evolution is making us grow taller.


8 posted on 07/04/2005 10:20:10 PM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedom44
“Our evidence of humans in America 40,000 years ago is irrefutable.”

That's gonna leave a mark I'm afraid. Liable to bunch up some underwear too.

12 posted on 07/04/2005 10:53:53 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedom44
Excellent..

Any idea, is this the oldest evidence now?
I seem to recall that sites on the eastern seaboard are this age or older, but there hasn't been definite confirmed carbon dating..

If early man reached america, say, 50K years ago across the atlantic, then he could very well have spread down the coast to Mexico/Central America, etc..

Not ruling out the Japan-Taiwan-Polynesian hypothesis in the article, just think either, or both is possible..

13 posted on 07/04/2005 11:00:58 PM PDT by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedom44

Human left footprint showing toe impressions and slight heel impression.

Footprints preserved in volcanic ash.

The footprints were made shortly after the deposition of the Xalnene ash and were preserved as trace fossils by the relatively fast deposition of fine-grained lake-sediment as the lake later transgressed across the site.

Rock shelter overlooking Valsequillo basin. Several early Holocene human skeletons were buried in the rock shelter.

Palaeoenvironment of the Valsaquillo Basin, Mexico - University of Nottingham

The Oldest American? Footprints from the Past - Liverpool John Moores University - Bournemouth University

14 posted on 07/04/2005 11:09:12 PM PDT by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedom44

This will change the entire assumed history of the casino industry.


15 posted on 07/04/2005 11:11:57 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedom44

So who were they, and what happened to them? If they really are 40K years old then genetic and other data indicates that they are not the ancestors of today's American Indians. Instead, they must have been from an ealier group that went extinct.


16 posted on 07/04/2005 11:16:23 PM PDT by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedom44

Oddly enough, the footprints were headed north.


18 posted on 07/05/2005 1:06:57 AM PDT by commonasdirt (Reading DU so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

similar, but younger threads:

Mexico offers up ancient footprints (40,000 year old footprints)
Guardian (U.K.) | Tuesday July 5, 2005 | Maev Kennedy
Posted on 07/04/2005 11:15:36 PM PDT by nickcarraway
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1436677/posts

40,000-year-old footprint of first Americans
The Telegraph (U.K.) | 5-07-2005 | Roger Highfield
Posted on 07/05/2005 3:38:09 AM PDT by Renfielhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1436721/posts


20 posted on 07/05/2005 8:22:51 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedom44; blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; StayAt HomeMother; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; asp1; ...
Thanks Freedom44. To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest
-- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

21 posted on 07/05/2005 8:25:22 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedom44

This one made the radio news this morning. Are the 'original inhabitants' of the New World getting anxious yet?


22 posted on 07/05/2005 8:30:25 AM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The edition I have is about 50 years old, the quote from p 402:
Gods, Graves, and Scholars: The Story of Archaeology
by C. W. Ceram
Now, several of these pyramids located at different sites from Tula to Monte Alban have been discussed, yet one of the most important has yet to be mentioned. This is the Pyramid of Cuicuilco, which stands on a mound 22.4 feet high, situated at the southern limits of Mexico City. The Pyramid of Cuicuilco rises up out of a weird landscape of darkly stony aspect. At one time the volcanoes Ajusco and Xitli (perhaps only the latter) erupted. The god within the pyramid was apparently remiss in diverting the glowing flood of lava that flowed about the pyramid, for half the structure was drowned in bubbling muck. The archaeologists investigating this phenomenon called on colleagues from another faculty, the geologists, for help. How old is the lava, they inquired. The geologists, not realizing that their answer was knocking a world picture awry, answered: "Eight thousand years." ...Yet late research is more inclined to consider it false.
The persistent practice of underestimating human antiquity in the Americas, is a big problem (except for those who do it, of course), and I'm not going to call into question all geological dating practices, but be aware that these results will likely be derided as unreliable by some. Others will saddle on the results right away, in order to bury Clovis-First-and-Only in a well-deserved grave. However, if past practice is any guide, even if this date is accepted (with or without modification), it will become the new floor beneath which dates won't be accepted.

FR Lexicon·Posting Guidelines·Excerpt, or Link only?·Ultimate Sidebar Management·Headlines
Donate Here By Secure Server·Eating our own -- Time to make a new start in Free Republic
PDF to HTML translation·Translation page·Wayback Machine·My Links·FreeMail Me
Gods, Graves, Glyphs topic·and group·Books, Magazines, Movies, Music


23 posted on 07/05/2005 8:36:34 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Erectus in the Americas:

24 posted on 07/05/2005 8:42:56 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

http://freerepublic.info/focus/keyword?k=preclovis

and...

Mexico Discovery Fuels Debate About Man's Origins
Deseret Morning News/Associated Press | 10-3-2004 | John Rice
Posted on 10/11/2004 6:04:15 PM PDT by blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1242132/posts

First Americans - Homo Erectus in America
http://home.pacbell.net/tcbpfb/ | January 01, 1999 | Tom Baldwin (apparently)
Posted on 09/24/2004 7:54:26 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1226526/posts


25 posted on 07/05/2005 8:46:57 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedom44
The last thing many "Native Americans" want to hear is that their ancestors replaced an earlier native population the same way settlers from the Old World replaced them.
27 posted on 07/05/2005 8:55:42 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson