Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(SCOTUS) On Your Garza (Ginsburg Is Very Sick, May Retire After November)
The American Spectator ^ | 7/5/2005 | The Prowler

Posted on 07/04/2005 9:20:24 PM PDT by GOPGuide

[SNIP]

On Friday, with the announced retirement of Sandra Day O'Connor from the Supreme Court, It took a few minutes for the news to set in on Capitol Hill, among Republicans and Democrats alike. After all, even the White House in briefing Republican leadership on the Hill spoke in the belief that it would be Chief Justice William Rehnquist who is retiring.

"The White House seemed to be expecting Rehnquist first, that was what my boss was getting briefed on," says a staffer for a Senator sitting on the Judiciary Committee. "We were told Rehnquist in July, possibly later this year."

Rumors are already swirling about a possible third retirement after November. The most likely would be Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who according to former Supreme Court clerks may be in poorer health than Justice Rehnquist.

"That's the seat for [Albert] Gonzales, that third seat if it opens up," says Department of Justice staffer. "All of this depends on how the first nomination goes, but the assumption here is that this is not the time for Gonzales."

As of this writing federal Judge Emilio Garza is the frontrunner to replace O'Conner. There are several indicators, which may all be red herrings, but that is half the fun.

First, Texas Sen. John Cornyn met with the President, as well as Chief of Staff Andrew Card and several members of the White House Counsel office early Friday. Up on Capitol Hill, rumors were quickly swirling that Cornyn had been offered the Supreme Court nomination. Those rumors were fueled when his senior staff essentially went underground for several hours.

But later in the day, Cornyn was making television appearances to discuss the nominations process, as well as placing an op-ed about the process.

Cornyn is now believed to be the President's point person in the Senate to help measure the level of support for potential nominees. "He's the President's 'consultation' guy," says a Senate leadership source. "That's how we're proceeding. If he is the nominee, we will be surprised again. But that's nothing new with this White House."

Cornyn and Garza know each other from their days in Texas and other legal circles.

Another indicator of Garza's status is that several senior Republican staffers on the Judiciary Committee have begun poring over court rulings from the period of 1987 through 1990, a period when Garza served as a U.S. district judge before his elevation to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

That research, though, could just as well apply to Judge Edith Hollan Jones, who has been sitting on the Fifth Circuit since 1985. Jones was considered for possible Supreme Court nominations by President George H.W. Bush.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: appointment; bush; conservatism; conservatives; garza; ginsburb; gonzales; justice; liberals; nuclearoption; rats; republican; retirement; rumors; ruthbaderginsburg; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-202 next last
To: SAJ

ROTFL; now that headline I believe.


101 posted on 07/04/2005 10:44:27 PM PDT by streetpreacher (If at the end of the day, 100% of both sides are not angry with me, I've failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

I disagree. If one of the liberals retires, that is where Bush will take the opportunity to put in Gonzales. I have no doubt Bush wants to appoint Gonzales to the Court at some point.


102 posted on 07/04/2005 10:46:54 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Or someone other than Anthony Kennedy, a thin reed.


103 posted on 07/04/2005 10:47:40 PM PDT by RobbyS (chirho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: All
Ruth Bader Ginsberg is one of the most bigotted, anti-Christian, anti-Constitution hypocrites that has ever wormed into high office.

Check her record and her world-view, it matches the Communist Manifesto and then takes it up a notch.

Glad you are leaving Ruth, your politics were lethal.

104 posted on 07/04/2005 10:50:29 PM PDT by Old Landmarks (No fear of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

----What happens if a SC justice gets incapacitated? Goes on a ventilator or something and cannot function? Is there a process for replacing that justice or do we have to wait for her/him to die? Thanks.----

I'm suddenly reminded of the old "Saturday Night Live" sketch in which Steve Martin is a doctor advising the parents who want to remove their terminal vegetable of a son (John Belushi) from life-support that legally, he can't pull the plug, but that accidents do happen. ("OH NO! My LEG is tangled in the cord!" "Okay, Doctor, uh, here.... let me get your foot out.... "Yeah! Maybe you could just PULL on it!")

-Dan

105 posted on 07/04/2005 10:54:42 PM PDT by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Get a grip. Gonzales is so much more conservative than ginzberg. If a third or fourth seat opens, look for Gonzales. Also, the Ginsberb seat may also go to Sen Lieberman - also more conservative than Ginsberg. Let's lay off Gonzales - if he is W's friend, how lib can he be?


106 posted on 07/04/2005 10:54:52 PM PDT by uscabjd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
Judge Edith Hollan Jones, who has been sitting on the Fifth Circuit since 1985. Jones was considered for possible Supreme Court nominations by President George H.W. Bush.

You mean we could have Jones on the Court, instead of Souter? Shows you how important it is to pick the right person.

107 posted on 07/04/2005 10:56:37 PM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

I would just be glad to see her go. Anyone would be better. Say, in the meantime, I wonder if her house would make a nice site for a hotel.


108 posted on 07/04/2005 10:58:59 PM PDT by Colorado Doug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colorado Doug

She lives under a bridge.


109 posted on 07/04/2005 11:00:31 PM PDT by alessandrofiaschi (NO GONZALES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: uscabjd

Lieberman? Are you drunk? He he a Stevens-Souter in waiting.


110 posted on 07/04/2005 11:03:58 PM PDT by alessandrofiaschi (NO GONZALES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

The ACLU would push into overdrive coniption fits. Remember Ginsberg was lead counsel for the communist founded organization.


111 posted on 07/04/2005 11:05:17 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uscabjd

Time to round up the FRinos and put them on trains...


112 posted on 07/04/2005 11:18:47 PM PDT by streetpreacher (If at the end of the day, 100% of both sides are not angry with me, I've failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher

Sorry, I don't know what came over me; must have been having a Pat Buchanan moment.


113 posted on 07/04/2005 11:19:31 PM PDT by streetpreacher (If at the end of the day, 100% of both sides are not angry with me, I've failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: uscabjd

I did just notice that Gonzales is 49, while Garza is 58. I must say Gonzales being 49 is an attractive trait to me.

I just read a thumbnail discussion of his pros and cons. I think the complaints about him are that he is possibly pro-affirmative action and not pro-life. I wonder how well established these are?

His having to recuse himself in War on Terror cases is a very big negative to me. But maybe as the 3rd Bush appointee possible recusing would be less of an issue?


114 posted on 07/04/2005 11:20:27 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
Cornyn is now believed to be the President's point person in the Senate to help measure the level of support for potential nominees. "He's the President's 'consultation' guy..."

Like Dick Cheney was the President's "consulatation guy" for potential vice-presidents?

I'm hoping (as are many others here on FR) that it'll be Janice Brown, but GWB does not think like a freeper, does he?

115 posted on 07/04/2005 11:21:55 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Gonzales once referred to the Roe vs. Wade decision as "settled law". Putting aside even his position on abortion itself, if that's the way he sees court decisions then he definitely doesn't belong on the S.C.

-Dan

116 posted on 07/04/2005 11:25:20 PM PDT by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Flux Capacitor

Gonzales is a Latin Rino. Stop!


117 posted on 07/04/2005 11:28:20 PM PDT by alessandrofiaschi (NO GONZALES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

That's what I really love about the dems. They are so cheap! $5 to homeless to vote.


118 posted on 07/04/2005 11:31:27 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher
(g!)

As do the huge majority of folks in all surrounding counties, in either MO or IL.

119 posted on 07/04/2005 11:31:35 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Flux Capacitor

Gonzales once referred to the Roe vs. Wade decision as "settled law". Putting aside even his position on abortion itself, if that's the way he sees court decisions then he definitely doesn't belong on the S.C.
____________________________________________________

Of course as a presidential advisor, Attorney General or even a Texas Supreme Court Judge, Roe v. Wade was settled law. That is he was in no position to overturn that decision in any of those position and to do his job had to accept the current "settled law."

As you say, if he would not return to the Constitution on issues where the court has strayed from the constitution like the recent "international" death penalty decision or Roe v. Wade or the Enemy Combatant decision, then he does not belong on the SCOTUS. However if he was only talking about the reality of doing his job at the time, then I would want to know more about him.


120 posted on 07/04/2005 11:33:43 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson