1 posted on
07/04/2005 5:41:30 PM PDT by
CHARLITE
To: Congressman Billybob; bocopar
SCOTUS appointee ping!
Char :)
3 posted on
07/04/2005 5:42:52 PM PDT by
CHARLITE
(I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
To: CHARLITE
That's one change in American politics in the last 100 years. Used to be that the citizens didn't think much beyond the street they lived on.
4 posted on
07/04/2005 5:44:28 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
To: CHARLITE; mhking
9 posted on
07/04/2005 5:57:13 PM PDT by
groanup
To: CHARLITE
Project 21 bump! Black people need RKBA and private property rights (among others) even more than more economically-privileged groups.
13 posted on
07/04/2005 6:02:28 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
("I am saying that the government's complicity is dishonest and disingenuous." ~NCSteve)
To: CHARLITE
Presently, only three justices meet the common-sense criteria demanded by Project 21. It's incredible that it even needs to be stated that Supreme Court justices should rule based on the Constitution's language and it's authors' original intent rather than on the chic political correctness of the day, as if the Constitution did not contain its own means for amendment.
But here we are - - the Supreme Court is top-heavy with pompous, liberal, activist scumbags and Bush has a chance to replace at least one of them with a new justice who has respect for American tradition and its founding principles.
Dubya better come through.
To: CHARLITE
Another BIG BUMP for the amazing Project 21.
To: CHARLITE
19 posted on
07/05/2005 12:07:19 AM PDT by
lunarbicep
("Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve." - G. B. Shaw)
To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
As a "non-partisan group", we (Project 21) as a group cannot endorse a specific name for the President, but we can establish criteria and qualifications that we believe the White House should follow. Personally, I'd love to see the President nominate Janice Rogers Brown, but considering that she's just been named to the DC Circuit, I don't anticipate her name being submitted.
I have to agree with the criteria - a strict constructionist in the vein of Thomas or Scalia, certainly one who does not feel the urge to "legislate" from the bench - is who the President should choose.
Black conservative ping
If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
20 posted on
07/05/2005 4:46:09 AM PDT by
mhking
(The world needs a wake up call gentlemen...we're gonna phone it in.)
To: CHARLITE
While I am largely in agreement with the him, the statement
"judicial activism" has been used to legitimize flag-burning, is inapt.
Burning our beloved flag, heinous though the act is, represents an exercise of free speech. Just my opinion, of course.
22 posted on
07/05/2005 8:32:50 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: CHARLITE
Ping
23 posted on
07/05/2005 12:55:20 PM PDT by
T Lady
(The only good Democrat is a Democrat that's been voted out of office)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson