Skip to comments.
Senate Votes to Shut Down Laser Meant for Fusion Study
NY Times ^
| July 2, 2005
| WILLIAM J. BROAD
Posted on 07/03/2005 10:00:05 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: Banjoguy
Sorry!
That should have been:
http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/ZP/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z-Pinch
41
posted on
07/04/2005 3:12:33 AM PDT
by
Banjoguy
(T. Stuart: POS)
To: Banjoguy
Is this about perfecting the engineering of a process proven in theory, or is this about woodshed experimentation?
42
posted on
07/04/2005 3:13:34 AM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: HiTech RedNeck
Let France pour money down a hole for 40 years if it wants. Speaking of money holes, what's IRaq at now, gotta be over $200 B's down that mideast rathole by now (I know, I know, sacred cow...).
The amount of energy independence that amount could buy is staggering.
To: Vis Numar
Stomping on Al Qaeda to the point they fear to cross us is worth it, when the alternative is vastly worse.
44
posted on
07/04/2005 3:26:14 AM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: HiTech RedNeck
My understanding is that all the experimentel approaches to the production of fusion, (there have been others such as Plasma confinement in a diode configuration,) attempt to reproduce in the lab what is already being accomplished in nature.
Theories abound and one needs to configure an experiment with the most promising outcome, try it and then, such as in all experimental lab work, make changes which get you closer to the expected outcome.
But as you probably know the process does not always cooperate. The diode approached was abandoned several years ago in favor of z-pinch.
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/5/6
45
posted on
07/04/2005 3:40:48 AM PDT
by
Banjoguy
(T. Stuart: POS)
To: HiTech RedNeck
One more good reference:
http://www.sandia.gov/capabilities/pulsed-power/hedicf/ionsource/
46
posted on
07/04/2005 3:43:19 AM PDT
by
Banjoguy
(T. Stuart: POS)
To: montag813
3.5 billion, and they canned it, but Bush's despicable $15 billion down the African rathole of murderous billionaire tyrants?How much has Iraq cost thus far? About $200 billion and rising right? And medicare wasnt that to the tune of about $500 billion.
Squiblling about the 3.5 or 15 compared to those numbers makes you appear outright stingy.
To: RadioAstronomer
IMHO, one of the great scientific blunders of the 20th century. Fortunately we were able to get the Gravity Probe-B off the ground. That was a close call. Gravity Probe B is one of the longest running government projects ever, going back almost to the beginning of NASA. What do you think the measurements will show? I don't think there'll be any surprises as frame dragging has already been measured, I believe by observing a pulsar.
That said, scientists need to learn how to build projects in multiple congressional districts with influential representatives.
48
posted on
07/04/2005 3:55:33 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: neverdem
Is Domenici losing his marbles?Did he ever have any?
49
posted on
07/04/2005 4:00:24 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Looks like the Supreme Court wants to play Cowboys and Homeowners.)
To: neverdem
Why are people complaining that government is cutting the budget? Government has no business funding research. We waste billions each year on all this garbadge.
50
posted on
07/04/2005 5:59:17 AM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/janicerogersbrown.htm)
To: traviskicks
Government has no business funding research.IMHO, basic research is vital to our national defense. That is exactly the kind of stuff our government should be funding.
51
posted on
07/04/2005 6:04:30 AM PDT
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: seacapn
"This sounds like raw, jealous political wrangling at its worst. Crazy Pete needs to step back and stop acting like someone's spurned lover."
Hmm.. Boxer and Feinstein eh? Wonder what the tradeoff will be to allow this to complete.
52
posted on
07/04/2005 6:16:28 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
To: Randi Papadoo
Yeah.
We should have used that approach for NASA. Who needs all that space anyway?
Yes, raise the french flag on the moon!
This fusion project isn't going to die, and we will continue with it.
If you all are waiting for the international community to succeed in this, don't hold your breath.
The US technology is going in a different ways, and the project in france will probably be sucking up billions long after there is no oil left in the world.
53
posted on
07/04/2005 6:33:40 AM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Vis Numar
Which would have never happened.
It all would have gone to leftist welfare, social engineering, and energy and research would be exactly as before, with the possible exception of stem cell and aids research..
54
posted on
07/04/2005 6:37:49 AM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: HiTech RedNeck
55
posted on
07/04/2005 6:38:30 AM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: traviskicks
Yeah, what the h*ll was that stupid Manhatten project about anyway?
56
posted on
07/04/2005 6:40:27 AM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: bill1952
Yeah, what the h*ll was that stupid Manhatten project about anyway?
---
I'm talking about non-military research.
57
posted on
07/04/2005 7:17:42 AM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/janicerogersbrown.htm)
To: FierceDraka
It seems that there are those at high levels who are more interested in maintaining the un-maintainable status quo than in positive change. Yep. Another case of "follow the money".......
The poster who observed that $2.8 billion could have had a working fission reactor online and producing enormous amounts of badly-needed electrical energy by now has a very cogent point.
In a breeder fuel cycle, there is enough uranium on Earth alone to supply the entire Earth's population with US standards of electricity consumption until the sun burns out. Fission? Why bother?
59
posted on
07/04/2005 7:27:19 AM PDT
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: Justanobody
'So they are flushing 2.8 billion??? Why? Lemme guess, they want to spend the money to force some emission nonsense?'
maybe so we can send all those billions to the starving people in RWanda...oh, wait, there aren't any people left in Rwanda....
Live8, "We are the World", etc...just more money for the african strongmen locals/UN to steal...
we need an update of the Tsunami aid...but don't send Carter or Clinton, cuz they'll take their cuts, too...
60
posted on
07/04/2005 7:44:14 AM PDT
by
bitt
('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson