Fred Barnes thinks it will be Luttig.
Gonzalez is anti second amendment...just remember that.
The best conservative is the one that liberals think will be liberal.
Juan Williams is a horses a$$ and always has been. lol
"You can act like a man! [slap] What's the matter with you?"
There's a Godfather quote for everything...:-)
Remember when they said Dubya would choose Pataki as his veep. Then they said he'd choose Whitman.
The left tries to get the conservative's in a tizzy.
That man has the best state of mind in the country!
Not just NO on Gonzales but HELL NO.
I do not believe Gonzales will be appointed. I do think Juan or my opinion will not mean a thing. The President will make his decision according to principle no matter how people react. No one will know until he wants us to know.
Though I do believe if appointed he wouldn't live up to the the hype conservatives have annointed him with. I say this not because I feel comfortable about Gonzales, but I do feel comfortable that Bush shares the same committment to a Judiciary that doesn't overstep it's authority. Friendship would not trump principle.
I do find it interesting that not a few months ago, Gonzales was worse than the terrorists. Now Juan is promoting him. To me this suggests one thing. The Liberals do not have a mind of their own. If they note strong disapproval on our side, they automatically think it's a good idea. If they note strong approval, vice versa.
Take the filibuster gang pack. They initially were unhappy. Then they saw how unhappy most of us were, and suddenly they were in high spirits. Now they are miserable again. Whereas most people that were furious about that Judas pact, are still furious about it. Those happy about it, remained so. Our opinions did not fluctuate based on how the Democrats reacted or the aftermath.
It's funnier than Hell, in an aggravating way, that the Democrats and "liberals" are dictating to Bush who should be the next Supreme Justice. Isn't it enough for them that they have former ACLU associate Bader-Ginsberg on the Court? Bush has nothing to lose and would gain respect if he told the Dems to go to Hell, that he wants someone who will be absolutely true to the Constitution because the Constitution is THE FIRMLY SET FOUNDATION, and the Constitution is NOT "liberally" transmutable. Good GAD, I wish that man Bush would talk back with backbone, grit and guts! He owes no appeasement to these sociopathic leftist demagogues.
Abortion is NOT the litmus test. (I am so sick of that blasted whining issue!) A thoroughly exhausting oral exam proving the comprehension and strict adherence to the meaning and spirit of the Constitution should be the litmus test. Foundation principles do not evolve through arbitrary interpretations and according to the vagaries of the times. (The Frikkin Flighty French have revised their "constitution" 13 times since their last revolution. The French are still looking for founding principles!)
I feel my rant mode coming on...
Juan supporting Gonzales is enough for me to know we don't want him on the court.
Apparently, liberals think Alberto Gonzalez has the best chance to be the next John Paul Stevens/David Souter.
Juan Williams' recommendation is as good as our local Democrat house organ morning paper's endorsement. It means "Don't do it".
"Gonzales" is Spanish for "Souter".
That just shows to go ya that Gonzales is the wrong choice ala David Souter.
The libs are willing to get anybody on the court that is pro-abort.
And they see Gonzales as their best hope.
Gonzales...no way. Never.
DuuuH.. He means a a "Souter" or "Stevens" even..
SOoo, the propaganda starts..