Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

we do have an amendment We also have a Supreme Court that
believes they alone can say what any amendment means -and
quite often of late what they say it means has zero relation to what the clear language and original intent meant-so by all accounts we need either a new Court--or a new amendment and as weveryone knows it is easier for a mere politician to write a new amendment than it is to Impeach an unjust Judge.


26 posted on 07/02/2005 7:31:32 AM PDT by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: StonyBurk

I see your point ... but I don't see why anyone would think a new amendment would make a difference. If SCOTUS is going to "interpret" using Babelfish, they can amend until you're blue in the face, but it won't do any good.


27 posted on 07/02/2005 7:34:25 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("I am saying that the government's complicity is dishonest and disingenuous." ~NCSteve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson