A Supreme Court nomination is the number one reason I voted for GWBush. I want a strict "constitutionalist" on the court.
Good luck on that one. In his speech about the judges annouced retirement he says he will look for a replacement that can "interpret" the Constitution. A true Constructionist actually just boils down to a judge who will actually "uphold" the Constitution and rule of law. Not "interpret it". The Constitution reads as it reads. There are no "hidden messages" in the Constitution for these "great magic sages" to "interpret".