Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mdefranc

I'm talking about what happened behind the scenes there. A lot of Republicans didn't want him confirmed, and they were content to let the Democrats "bork" him because it helped these Senators stand up for him in public even though they opposed him -- which carried a lot of weight with the GOP base.


481 posted on 07/01/2005 8:10:23 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Please cite one published source that supports your Watergate explanation of GOP Senate opposition to Robert Bork.


710 posted on 07/01/2005 9:02:22 AM PDT by mdefranc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson